Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: It has been a big effort to also make ASF to move their servers Translation: the ASF has been making a huge effort to move their servers. No one "made" them do it. :-) --- Noel I was joking about the fact that Bernd thought I was guilt

RE: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: > It has been a big effort to also make ASF to move their servers Translation: the ASF has been making a huge effort to move their servers. No one "made" them do it. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscri

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
"Tanti auguri a te ... " Vincenzo Noel J. Bergman wrote: PS: today is my birthday Congratulations. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> PS: today is my birthday Congratulations. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann wrote: PS: today is my birthday, and is a great gift to have a public 2.3.0 final out there! +1 (literally!) Auguri, Stefano!! All the best! Have a nice release-... eh... birthday-party! Of course, we will all be coming tonight... ;-) BTW, now I know why we held the release

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Bernd Fondermann
PS: today is my birthday, and is a great gift to have a public 2.3.0 final out there! +1 (literally!) Auguri, Stefano!! All the best! Have a nice release-... eh... birthday-party! Of course, we will all be coming tonight... ;-) BTW, now I know why we held the release until today :-) Cheers,

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Norman Maurer
Stefano Bagnara schrieb: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Norman Maurer asked: Should we update the Site to point to 2.3 as best aviable version ? I believe that was Stefano's plan for after the mirrors had a few days to catch up. --- Noel Right! I verified randomly a bunch of mirrors and 2.3

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-30 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Norman Maurer asked: Should we update the Site to point to 2.3 as best aviable version ? I believe that was Stefano's plan for after the mirrors had a few days to catch up. --- Noel Right! I verified randomly a bunch of mirrors and 2.3.0 is there, so I just

RE: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Norman Maurer asked: > Should we update the Site to point to 2.3 as best aviable version ? I believe that was Stefano's plan for after the mirrors had a few days to catch up. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Norman Maurer
Noel J. Bergman schrieb: >> drwxrwxr-x 4 noel noel2048 Oct 26 14:07 server >> > > Fixed, but doesn't explain the problem I had as me. :-) > > I modified the README file by hand. Will synch with SVN tonight. > > --- Noel > Cool thx.. Should we update the Site to point to

RE: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> drwxrwxr-x 4 noel noel2048 Oct 26 14:07 server Fixed, but doesn't explain the problem I had as me. :-) I modified the README file by hand. Will synch with SVN tonight. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Stefano wrote: After you'll have moved the files to the dist folder, we'll wait a couple of days for the mirrors to be updated and we'll update the website to show the release and we'll announce it. Is this ok? I have merged the JAMES v2.3.0 release into the release

RE: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano wrote: > After you'll have moved the files to the dist folder, we'll wait a > couple of days for the mirrors to be updated and we'll update the > website to show the release and we'll announce it. > Is this ok? I have merged the JAMES v2.3.0 release into the release area, cleaned up the

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Why are we telling people that the release will be in a week? I could have posted it on Friday, since Norman, Stefano and I have all reviewed the packaging (to replace the ones lost in the colo move), and we'd all voted to release prior to the packages being lost.

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On 10/29/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why are we telling people that the release will be in a week? I could have posted it on Friday, since Norman, Stefano and I have all reviewed the packaging (to replace the ones lost in the colo move), and we'd all voted to release prior to

RE: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Why are we telling people that the release will be in a week? I could have posted it on Friday, since Norman, Stefano and I have all reviewed the packaging (to replace the ones lost in the colo move), and we'd all voted to release prior to the packages being lost. --- Noel

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-27 Thread Stefano Bagnara
People interested in testing this, please note that the "site" referred by Noel is his home on minotaur and not what is accessible via www. Via http on people.a.o you will find an old 2.3.0rc3 (don't test it!) I downloaded and tested the following things under windows: - src without phoenix: ant

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-26 Thread Norman Maurer
Noel J. Bergman schrieb: > See ~noel/james on people.a.o. This is compiled and built from the tag > directory, then signed, symlinked, and ready to move into the release area. > > Since we have already voted on what to release, this is just a request to > review the actual packages. > > ---

Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

2006-10-26 Thread Noel J. Bergman
See ~noel/james on people.a.o. This is compiled and built from the tag directory, then signed, symlinked, and ready to move into the release area. Since we have already voted on what to release, this is just a request to review the actual packages. --- Noel ---