Hello Jean,
On 08/09/2021 20:58, Jean Helou wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I switch threads because I agree with the removal of the FS based mailqueue
> but still find the maildir removal to be a bit more difficult.
>
> Quoting from the other thread at
>
Hello devs,
I switch threads because I agree with the removal of the FS based mailqueue
but still find the maildir removal to be a bit more difficult.
Quoting from the other thread at
https://www.mail-archive.com/server-dev@james.apache.org/msg70960.html
What protocols are supported by the 2.3
Hello,
I think you are making good points. It's probably better to focus on
what works well if it's enough of an alternative to maildir (like
embedded JPA as you mentionned), with little resources we have.
+1 !
Rene.
On 05/09/2021 19:58, btell...@apache.org wrote:
Hello all,
While
Hello all,
While reviewing overall file path sanitizing (JAMES-3646) I found
maildir to incorrectly sanitize some file path.
Playing around, I discovered some magic names that leads to maildir
errors namely MAILBOX-406, and a NPE with an empty mailbox (MAILBOX-407).
Moreover, over time the list
