Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is there a reason you haven't committed this to the 3.0 branch yet?
I thought we were trying to keep 3.0 sync'd as well.
Because it requires a code change, that would mean committing v2 code into
v3, and we'd ask that I hold off merging until everything was merged.
Is there a
> Is there a reason you haven't committed this to the 3.0 branch yet?
> I thought we were trying to keep 3.0 sync'd as well.
Because it requires a code change, that would mean committing v2 code into
v3, and we'd ask that I hold off merging until everything was merged.
--- Noel
Vicenzo,
You can try updating again as the branch_2_1_fcs has the older dnsjava
version(s) properly removed.
Noel,
Is there a reason you haven't committed this to the 3.0 branch yet? I
thought we were trying to keep 3.0 sync'd as well.
--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . str
