Irv
> We don't need the SMTP and POP3 portions of a mail
> server. We need the concept of an inbox, trash, different users,
> mailing "lists", etc. Does this seem like a fit for James?
Sounds like James with IMAP is what you need.
Sadly IMAP is still under development, but we're hoping a google
Hello,
we (Renato and I) would like to help increasing the momentum.
We would like to complete IMAP for James.
Sure we could work only by night, since we too have children, but I think we
could give good help.
During day time we work for two different software companies near Milan, in
Italy.
Is t
Author: danny
Date: Wed Jun 22 03:36:11 2005
New Revision: 191791
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=191791&view=rev
Log:
fix for JAMES-372 "OutOfMemoryError deleting inbox" Thanks to Theodore Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepositor
Author: danny
Date: Wed Jun 22 03:44:25 2005
New Revision: 191795
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=191795&view=rev
Log:
changed exception logging
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository/AvalonMailRepository.java
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-372?page=all ]
Danny Angus resolved JAMES-372:
---
Fix Version: 3.0
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, commited "Completed: At revision: 191791"
> Inboxes deleted during OutOfMemoryError
> --
Hi,
I've reviewed and commited this change based upon the code alone, no tests,
it is very straightforward but I will be happier if someone interested
could confirm that Jame still works!
d.
Author: danny
Date: Wed Jun 22 03:36:11 2005
New Revision: 191791
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
OutOfMemoryError is not a RuntimeException but an Error, isn't it?
The debug was from that code but I think the exception was really a
RuntimeException and not an OutOfMemoryError: it probably was encapsulated
in a RuntimeException before.
Let's read the DEBUG log...
> DEBUG mailstore: Exception
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-372?page=comments#action_12314217 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-372:
---
OutOfMemoryError is not a RuntimeException but an Error, isn't it?
The debug was from that code but I think the exception was rea
Thanks for the info. I don't really want to use IMAP either. I
really need it to be just embedded, where I call the Java apis and it
talks directly to the database. I just need the structure of the
folders, users, etc. Does it still sound plausible?
Irv
On 6/22/05, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECT
Author: danny
Date: Wed Jun 22 04:47:36 2005
New Revision: 191808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=191808&view=rev
Log:
OOM is not caught, but it is the cause of the RuntimeException which _is_
caught.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository/AvalonMailRep
you're right, its the cause ("cause: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError") that is
an OOME
However it is the responibility of the catch in AvalonMailRepository to
delete/not delete the mail,
so I've changed that to use the cause, and not delete the mail for _any_
Error.
This may result in the file leak re
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-372?page=all ]
Danny Angus reassigned JAMES-372:
-
Assign To: Danny Angus
> Inboxes deleted during OutOfMemoryError
> ---
>
> Key: JAMES-372
> URL: http://i
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-372?page=comments#action_12314218 ]
Danny Angus commented on JAMES-372:
---
Agree with Stefano, change commited to use the type of the cause of the RE as
the criteria in the decsion whether or not to delete.
If th
Further to the subject of the Web Admin Console, I took the liberty to
build a small prototype web application for which i am enclosing a
download link to get your comments (had included attachments in a
previous message, but the list wouldn't have them). You can navigate it
but it contains no fun
Hi Juan,
I looked at the console prototype, and I think it's pretty well
executed (the UI is very crisp and neatly done).
However, I think we need to discuss more on the subject of navigation.
I was envisioning more like a frames page, navigation bar on the left
side, content pane on the right si
As long as we are talking about the web admin UI, can I state the
obvious and request that the HTML render properly/sensibly in text-only
browsers like Lynx? Many servers run headless and don't have X
installed, and I bet a lot of users will only want to open the web admin
port to localhost.
Good point Joe. Actually this prototype contains next to no layout in
the html, its all css based, so it should be a matter of adding some CSS
to the style file and viola! lynx-friendly html.
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 13:56 -0400, Joe Cheng wrote:
> As long as we are talking about the web admin UI, c
>
> The thing is, if people start adding extra configuration modules
> (Mailets and Matchers, for example, may add config options) then the
> tree view works better, and can speed up navigation than if the nav
> options were just available in a top nav bar.
>
I was thinking about extensibility
> The problem i have with the tree view is that its concept serves the
> purpose of being able to switch between leaves in different branches or
> have a total overall view of the tree, which might not be that important
> here. Each section in the prototype already includes about 15 to 20
> items,
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 16:48 -0500, Anne S wrote:
> Open source isn't quite known for it's terrific graphics, but we might
> be able to grab some pictures from clip art libraries assuming the
> license is OK.
Totally right on this one, i actually laughed out loud recalling some
stuff i've seen.
I found some really cool icon sets for this purpose at KDE-Look.org,
check them out:
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4914
Have to keep an eye out for the lincense as you suggested.
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 16:48 -0500, Anne S wrote:
> Open source isn't quite known for it's terrif
Sorry, wrong link on last one, here is the right link:
http://www.kde-look.org/index.php?xsortmode=down&page=0
--
Juan Carlos Murillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
You mean like xwork / webwork ?
lol
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Juan Carlos Murillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:15 PM
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: Proposal for Web Admin Console
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 16:48 -0500, Anne S wrote:
> Open sourc
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 15:53 -0700, Steve Short wrote:
> You mean like xwork / webwork ?
>
> lol
>
> Steve
:) well its not like xwork OWNS the command pattern patent, they are
just the most notorious example in enterprise java. I am sure nobody
will protest about us doing our own. Plus this
> Sorry, wrong link on last one, here is the right link:
>
> http://www.kde-look.org/index.php?xsortmode=down&page=0
They are GPL licensed. You can't distribute them with ASL projects.
Stefano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
> > You mean like xwork / webwork ?
> >
> > lol
> >
> > Steve
>
> :) well its not like xwork OWNS the command pattern patent,
> they are just the most notorious example in enterprise java.
> I am sure nobody will protest about us doing our own. Plus
> this thing is like three interfaces bi
>
> Xwork is really slim: you should consider using if you need the command
> pattern.
> You will get Interceptors (AOP like) and simple Components (IoC) for free.
Sounds good to me, whatever is faster/easier.
--
Juan Carlos Murillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
You mean like xwork / webwork ?
lol
Steve
:) well its not like xwork OWNS the command pattern patent,
they are just the most notorious example in enterprise java.
I am sure nobody will protest about us doing our own. Plus
this thing is like three interfaces
> I, for one, totally agree with using webwork. I used it before in a
> couple of projects. Their intercepter is really cool.
> Only one thing hindering here is the use of their tag library, it takes
> quite a bit effort to use standard tag library with Webwork
>
Well the idea was to use xwork
Juan Carlos Murillo wrote:
Sorry, wrong link on last one, here is the right link:
http://www.kde-look.org/index.php?xsortmode=down&page=0
I've been using the Nuvola icons (from that page), for about a year now
for web apps and I really recommend them. Since they're for an OS, they
really c
32 matches
Mail list logo
