On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Serge Knystautas wrote:
> > This is a good example of Robert's points on modularity. If mordred
> > was a separate project built separately, we could keep it as a binary
> > dependency, no?
>
> Except that the issue i
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
That sort of thinking led Stefano to push to rush out v2.3.0 over my
objections that there was a critical memory leak.
This is an obvious attempt to discredit other committers and bring back
the old hostile atmosphere we were able to overcome
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I don't trust 2.3.1 more than TRUNK or any other James snapshot.
That's really too bad, since we know from empirical experience that JAMES
2.3 + my patches hold up to years of real-world production loads. We have
some justification that 2.3.x ar
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> if anyone needs to use mordred with newer versions of java then they
> can submit a patch
As I mentioned earlier, and we can deal with it then.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> That sort of thinking led Stefano to push to rush out v2.3.0 over my
>> objections that there was a critical memory leak.
> This is an obvious attempt to discredit other committers and bring back
> the old hostile atmosphere we were able to overco
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The proposal is based on the fact that every message delivered to the
zone
> > will be disposable spam. Therefore, unlike performing some sort of faux
> > release without any basis, we will be testing in a risk-free
environment.
> > Every messag
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
(as everyone probably knows by know i'm a huge unfan of javamail so
i've avoided commenting)
I thought there was no need to be a fan or unfan to reply to this
developer. He simply asked how we are using javamail and how coupled is
James to javamail, and I sim
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sat May 3 13:24:07 2008
New Revision: 653129
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653129&view=rev
Log:
Missed this one
Removed:
james/server/trunk/spoolmanager-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/matchers/RelayLimit.java
---
i count:
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Stefano Bagnara
+1 Danny Angus
+1 Søren Hilmer
+1 Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
please jump in if i've missed any binding VOTEs
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sat May 3 14:21:04 2008
New Revision: 653140
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653140&view=rev
Log:
Bye Bye Mordred.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/mordred-library/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >> That sort of thinking led Stefano to push to rush out v2.3.0 over my
> >> objections that there was a critical memory leak.
> > This is an obvious attempt to di
12 matches
Mail list logo
