I've tested the app in gmail and it seems work although many things are
broken.
Related with your problems:
#1 I dont know why hupa-evo only works with the folder 'Inbox' which makes
fail demo mode which uses the name Mock-Inbox. If you replace Mock-Inbox by
Inbox in the url, the right panel is
qujickly reply for
I see the code a bit messy, It is difficult to figure out which is new and
what is old/legacy, I think you could create a new namespace for all the
new stuff (for instance evo) and follow some conventions either: all
classes related with an activity in a folder (view,
Hi, manolo
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.orgwrote:
I've tested the app in gmail and it seems work although many things are
broken.
Related with your problems:
#1 I dont know why hupa-evo only works with the folder 'Inbox' which makes
fail demo mode
First try this
1 - checkout last hupa.
2 - copy the exanple properties file to your home
3 - change the property IMAPServerAddress=hupa.demo
4 - go to the folder client
5 - run 'mvn clean package gwt:run -Pdemo'
6 - open your browser and go to the devel url
This script works to me:
cd /tmp
rm
looks good
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:58 PM, echo echo...@gmail.com wrote:
qujickly reply for
I see the code a bit messy, It is difficult to figure out which is new and
what is old/legacy, I think you could create a new namespace for all the
new stuff (for instance evo) and follow some
Hi, there
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.orgwrote:
First try this
1 - checkout last hupa.
2 - copy the exanple properties file to your home
3 - change the property IMAPServerAddress=hupa.demo
4 - go to the folder client
5 - run 'mvn clean package
Yes RF is much more productive than GWT-RPC.
And you are right does not match the command pattern.
There are many advantages of using RF, it is light, it is easy to serialize
entities into strings and cache messages in localstorage so as the user can
work offline, etc.
The project is almost ready
See https://builds.apache.org/job/james-server-trunk/3007/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
See https://builds.apache.org/job/james-app-trunk/982/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
See https://builds.apache.org/job/james-server-trunk/3008/
--
Failed to access build log
hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/james-server-trunk at
hudson.remoting.Channel@628ee378:ubuntu5
Hi,
Yes RF is much more productive than GWT-RPC.
And you are right does not match the command pattern.
There are many advantages of using RF, it is light, it is easy to serialize
entities into strings and cache messages in localstorage so as the user can
work offline, etc.
The project is
Hi there,
#1 I dont know why hupa-evo only works with the folder 'Inbox' which makes
fail demo mode which uses the name Mock-Inbox. If you replace Mock-Inbox by
Inbox in the url, the right panel is shown but it fails to show messages
because in the server the folder name is different. Try to
12 matches
Mail list logo
