[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950768#comment-16950768
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-2921:
---
Ok, then we might have a consensus here!
> Improve blob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950763#comment-16950763
]
Raphael Ouazana commented on JAMES-2921:
Exactly. That's why my proposal was: replace this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950758#comment-16950758
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-2921:
---
It's design was "I want to rely on a new solution (object
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16950755#comment-16950755
]
Raphael Ouazana commented on JAMES-2921:
> > Moreover, I think UnionBlobStore should be limited
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16949925#comment-16949925
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-2921:
---
> Moreover, I think UnionBlobStore should be limited to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16949301#comment-16949301
]
Gautier DI FOLCO commented on JAMES-2921:
-
I did some form fixes.
Moreover, I think
