On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good point. This part of the code is removed, but I haven't made it a
>> point to ensure that the code can backup a RO homedir. Actually, we
>> aren't well setup for a RO root fs at all (should an error kick us
>> into r
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we know if this XS detection works with UY's school servers? Can we
> run olpc-netstatus and scrape its output (or break it into separate
> tests, then have olpc-netstatus run those) instead of copying its code?
I've si
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Why not use /var/lock like everybody else? We can add appropriate users
>>> to the lock group if needed. (Or however Fedora does these things.) Are
>>> we better off making ~/.sugar/default contain our complete parallel
>>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Tarun Pondicherry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For Edublog, will it matter much
> which version we use?
Sorry, perhaps I haven't been clear - when I've said 1.9, I was
thinking of the tip of MOODLE_19_STABLE, the latest in the 1.9.x
series. Right now, it would be "
Yesterday, as the light receded in the horizon, Dennis and I had a
good chat about F7, some RPMs that need finding/building/backporting,
and some good ideas for server mgmt. These are my quick notes.
Packages we need
- Pg 8.2/8.3 and and the reverse-dependencies we'll use (php-pg,
python-pg, etc)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Tony Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin,
> I tried different kernels:
> 2.6.25.04-fd16 Gentoo-based SysRescueCD -- works
> 2.6.23.17-88.fc7 Fedora 7-i386 install DVD -- works
> 2.6.23.1-21.fc7 the XS-163 CD -- kernel panic
> 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 Fedora 7-i3
> Had a chat with Wad today about this - the kernel is the _latest_
> kernel on vanilla F7. The standard F7 install CD has a very early
> kernel, our install CD has a recent F7 kernel. In short, the recent F7
> kernel doesn't like your SATA controller.
> It's a nasty incompatibility. One alternati
Hi Martin,
From my reading of the forums it looks like users can choose the editor
they want to use in 2.0. I couldn't find any working patches for 1.9
(tried a few and got lots of errors). Most are for the latest version.
I was able to get tinyMCE working if I upgrade to 1.9.1. I'm curiou
