[Server-devel] physical security of the XS and XO-as-XS

2008-10-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
[Note: this is a resend - with some better editing - the earlier email got sent prematurely...] On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Bryan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) IMHO using > the XO as XS is not a good idea. Nothing explains in your post why it's a bad idea. If you are going to setup a

Re: [Server-devel] physical security of the XS and XO-as-XS

2008-10-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Bryan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) IMHO using > the XO as XS is not a good idea. Nothing explains your post why it's a bad idea. If you are going to setup a "safe" cabinet of some sort, it's not very different to make an XO safe from making a tower pc safe