On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:52:22 Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Well, 'strong' here is relative. In order to keep the checksum length
finite and hence encode more blocks we only use a portion of the bits; it's
a
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:11:23 tri...@samba.org wrote:
The per-block rolling hash should also be randomly seeded as Martin
mentioned. That way if the user does ask for the page again then the
hashing will be different. You need to send that seed along with the
request.
Hi Tridge,
I
2009/3/31 Dave Bauer d...@solutiongrove.com:
Ok I have the gadget RPM installed. What should I see in the admin
interface? I looked at virtual hosts - nodes - modules and I don't see
anything likely.
How can I tell if gadget is doing anything interesting?
If you're on IRC, ask daf or cassidy
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Yes, we need to chunk, because we can't hand the data on to the client until
we've verified it, at least in a serious implementation.
Hmmm. If I understand you right, the concern is that the rolling hash
matches in
If we go for the 'fail in case of mismatch' approach, we can keep streaming. We
simply have to make sure that we close the
connection before we have streamed the last block if we discover the global
checksum mismatch. And that is just a matter of putting
the global checksum validation before the
Le mardi 31 mars 2009 à 13:45 -0400, Dave Bauer a écrit :
Hi,
I am trying to get gadget working on my XS at
schoolserver.solutiongrove.com
First I downloaded the source and built it, but I could not find any
indication that gadget was installed. How can I tell if it is working?
Next I
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
Basically you have to install the gadget service, launch it (it's a
separated process), modify your ejabberd.cfg as explained in the Gadget
README and then restart your ejabberd.
I suspect he's done that already...
You can see if Gadget is
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 12:45 +0200, Martin Langhoff a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
Basically you have to install the gadget service, launch it (it's a
separated process), modify your ejabberd.cfg as explained in the Gadget
README and then restart your
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmot...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
If you're using a recent Sugar it should request a view containing
random activities and buddies. So you should see people/activities in
your roster even if the shared roster is not configured.
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 12:53 +0200, Martin Langhoff a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmot...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
If you're using a recent Sugar it should request a view containing
random activities and buddies. So you should see
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 14:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 12:45 +0200, Martin Langhoff a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:36 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:18:37AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 14:14 +0200, Jonas
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 17:37 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:18:37AM -0500, David Farning wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100,
So a quick question, what sort of http transfers are chunking most often
used for? I believe we will get poor results with the method for most types
of binary data, which tend to be the larger files. In the web context these
will generally have not changed at all (in which case traditional caching
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Toby Collett t...@plan9.net.nz wrote:
So a quick question, what sort of http transfers are chunking most often
used for? I believe we will get poor results with the method for most types
of binary data, which tend to be the larger files. In the web context these
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmot...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
(CCing Daf who is the author of this Debian package).
I suspect it's a small misunderstanding. It's a 'deb' package, (the
collabora team is very good in making sure their software is available
as .deb.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 04:49:33PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 17:37 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
1. Is it a Debian package of Gadget, ejabberd or something else?
The link I pasted you is a git branch of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmot...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
(CCing Daf who is the author of this Debian package).
I suspect it's a small
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 07:17 +1300, Toby Collett wrote:
So a quick question, what sort of http transfers are chunking most
often used for?
Dynamically generated content is the scenario for chunked transfers;
since you don't know the length a-priori, some other method of
indicating the message
19 matches
Mail list logo
