On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:52:22 Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Well, 'strong' here is relative. In order to keep the checksum length
finite and hence encode more blocks we only use a portion of the bits; it's
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:11:23 tri...@samba.org wrote:
The per-block rolling hash should also be randomly seeded as Martin
mentioned. That way if the user does ask for the page again then the
hashing will be different. You need to send that seed along with the
request.
Hi Tridge,
I
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 23:29:23 Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Toby Collett t...@plan9.net.nz wrote:
There is no error checking in the encoding itself, this is assumed to be
taken care in other layers, and we through in a strong hash on the whole
file to make sure
Hi,
Tridge just cc'd me on on a GSOC rsync-http mozilla project; given that
Martin is coordinating an apache proxy plugin, I thought I'd send a big
inclusive mail to make sure we all know about each other!
My involvement: a crcsync module in CCAN which can be used as a (simplified)
