Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: ext2 vs ext4 vs exFAT for XO content SD cards?

2015-08-16 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:24:23PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote: > On balance, SD Card industry standard exFAT seems (to me) more > future-proof for a hassle-free "grassroots content" partition over > coming years, > [...] If you're able to control the desktops and laptops that will be used to add or re

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: ext2 vs ext4 vs exFAT for XO content SD cards?

2015-08-16 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 09:12:34PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote: > Towards this quite universal demand, an exFAT partition seems much > better than FAT32, as exFAT works with most all recent Windows and > Mac machines, without filename limitations.  (Not unrelated to exFAT > being the modern SD Card indu

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: ext2 vs ext4 vs exFAT for XO content SD cards?

2015-08-16 Thread Adam Holt
A "Custom_Content" folder is eventually demanded by almost every IIAB-like deployment. The reason is that every local school / librarian quite naturally wants a Non-Bureaucratic process, to add their own language/videos/curriculum, copying their own file-tree onto the SD card, using their own Wind