On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:46 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
One can of course run just ejabberd on pretty much any distro, though I'm
not sure if that is what he is looking for.
Apples and oranges ;-)
This is about idmanager, and whether it's buggy or not when reading
its
Just out of curiosity... could those patches be added to other distros? Its
just a question... not trying to imply a switch or anything...
kind regards,
David
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:46 PM, David Van Assche
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:42 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
Think I've got the details little ironed out, with one little wrinkle,
idmgr looks
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
Think I've got the details little ironed out, with one little wrinkle,
idmgr looks like its ignoring it's idmgr.conf file, because BIND_DOMAIN
s/b BIND_ADDRESS. I had to # the BIND_ADDRESS in idmanager.py to get it
to respect
On Mar 15, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:09 AM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org
wrote:
And indeed, the XS services are intended for such reuse. I'm not
sure
how many patches to the stock ejabberd are still needed...
It's not so much the patches
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
I totally empathise. I'm trying to work out a solution, but like you
I've got other tasks as well. It's tricky for me as I'm new to this
OLPC stuff, having only started with OLPC Australia a couple of weeks
ago
On 16 March 2010 13:35, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
Indeed, I'm working on it now. I'm finding it somewhat tricky
understanding everything that's going on underneath, so that's why I'm
asking
Hi Martin,
Thank you very much for that explanation. It certainly helps to keep
everything in perspective.
What I think we really need is a turn-key ejabberd solution that
integrates with existing network services. If you or anyone else can
assist we'd be immensely grateful. I'll explain...
On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:06 AM, James Cameron wrote:
I don't know XS very well, but if ejabberd is all you need why not
take
the ejabberd configuration from XS sources and deploy that on an
otherwise vanilla instance?
And indeed, the XS services are intended for such reuse. I'm not sure
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 14:49 +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thank you very much for that explanation. It certainly helps to keep
everything in perspective.
What I think we really need is a turn-key ejabberd solution that
integrates with existing network services. If you or
10 matches
Mail list logo
