On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:39 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:51:55PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
I like Sugar Network, because the problem of content sharing is
examined from a top down design perspective, including the constraint
that internet
Oh, it was the latter paragraph that I retract. I still think Sugar
Network is a pretty cool idea that should be considered further by
both XS and XSCE developers.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:51:55PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
I like Sugar Network, because the problem of content sharing is
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:51:55PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
I like Sugar Network, because the problem of content sharing is
examined from a top down design perspective, including the constraint
that internet connectivity might not be available, or it may be
intermittent.
On the other
I like Sugar Network, because the problem of content sharing is
examined from a top down design perspective, including the constraint
that internet connectivity might not be available, or it may be
intermittent.
On the other hand, the two School Server projects (XS and XSCE) seem
to be bottom up
Hi Tony,
The people developing the Sugar Network are an international team
comprising people from different backgrounds.
Sugar Network is not a cloud-based resource. It is an offline / online
decentralized communication mechanism which runs at three levels
(everyone seems to love cake
El 06/08/13 08:33, Tony Anderson escribió:
As mentioned, there are server developments at many deployments. What
would be great is a co-operative team that would work to provide
capabilities in a way that can be distributed widely. I am sure that
Peru is working on a method to deliver email
Hi, Sebastian
My concern was email access in deployments which only have access to the
Internet by taking a usb drive to an internet cafe. I thought that Peru was
developing such a capability at least for software distribution. The
deployments
I am working with do not have access to the
On 08/06/2013 03:06 PM, server-devel-requ...@lists.laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Sameer Vermasve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Just noticed that on
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Installing_Software_0.7 it says that
stable version is XS 0.7 and unstable is XSCE 0.3
Is this correct?
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 15:33 +0200, Tony Anderson wrote:
On 08/06/2013 03:06 PM, server-devel-requ...@lists.laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Sameer Vermasve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Just noticed that on
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Installing_Software_0.7 it says that
stable
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 16:46 +0200, Tony Anderson wrote:
On 08/06/2013 04:22 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
I agree a fully offline install method is needed.
I think we are in substantial agreement.
My model is that the deployment has someone with technical skills
available who
prepares the
10 matches
Mail list logo
