On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Note that currently Puppet relies on some hard coded intel specific code.
>>
>> Oh really? I'm assuming it'd be in the "facter" code, using lspci and
>> dmidecode to get the "facts" about hardware
>
> I just checked ARM Koji an
>
>> Note that currently Puppet relies on some hard coded intel specific code.
>
> Oh really? I'm assuming it'd be in the "facter" code, using lspci and
> dmidecode to get the "facts" about hardware
I just checked ARM Koji and it looks like puppet is building okay on ARM and
passing the tests
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:13 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I have been meaning to email you an update about XS on ARM for a while.
> I had to take a hiatus from what I was doing with it, but started back on it
> a while back.
Great that you're back on track. True, Fedora branches were
unpred
Martin,
I have been meaning to email you an update about XS on ARM for a while.
I had to take a hiatus from what I was doing with it, but started back on it a
while back.
I had been experimenting with getting XS components running on ARM.
That was with Fedora 13 for ARM. With Fedora 13 for ARM e
