On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
> I plan to attend the OLPC conference in San Francisco in October. I will
> be available there to anyone who wishes to discuss our Laptops to Lesotho
> model in more detail.
>
> You can see the Rules & Regulations, Contracts, and Fine Schedules written
>
p.s. One anti-theft thing that I forgot to mention in my previous list
serve response was that we label and ENGRAVE all the laptops with big bold
numbers and codes in various locations on the laptops so anyone can tell
exactly who they belong to. Its pretty obvious they are from a school or
organ
In Peru, after around 2 years of regular contacts with the people in
charge of the deployment of the laptops in the government, the
constitution of an hack-tivism group and a document approved by OLPC
(US), they have allowed on person to have access to the secret key
allowing for the signature of a
Hi,
The Saint Jabob school in Kigali where I am providing deployment support
is not currently allowing the students to take laptops home
because the antitheft capability is not implemented.
The laptops were donated by WCE in Stuttgart. The laptops are locked.
The software version installed (8
Le samedi 25 août 2012 à 12:41 -0500, Sameer Verma a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I'm looking to get a sense of how widely antitheft is being used and
> to what level of success. There was a post recently where Bruce Baikie
> came across 500 XO-1s in Ethiopia, that were locked, but the server
> was dead/g
K. Caron [mailto:reu...@laptop.org]
> Enviado el: lunes, 09 de julio de 2012 01:31 p.m.
> Para: Edward Lopez
> CC: server-devel; Elias Jacobo Castillo
> Asunto: Re: [Server-devel] Antitheft system failure
>
> Edward, Elias,
>
> Let's look at this in phases:
>
> -
Edward, Elias,
Let's look at this in phases:
-1: The XO has no lease and needs a lease to run. So using either method (a.
Standard Leases) or (b. Delegated Leases) you preload the XS with leases.
-2: You turn the XO and it the SD card, USB, and Open Wifi for a lease.
-3. It finds an open AP con
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Martin
Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>> so you should probably return a
>> lease which is valid except for the fact that the signed string has an
>> randomly-chosen UUID
>
> Exactly my thoughts -- as you can see in the b
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> so you should probably return a
> lease which is valid except for the fact that the signed string has an
> randomly-chosen UUID
Exactly my thoughts -- as you can see in the bug. Implementing that
goes beyond merely coding it -- it would m
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Martin
Langhoff wrote:
> A while ago, Daniel fixed a bug in my changes to olpc-update, and that
> left me with a to-do item on the xs-activation side.
>
> Reviewed the situation on the OAT proto concept of always sending a
> stolen token, with the idea that xs-activ
10 matches
Mail list logo
