[Server-devel] problems installing xs-activation on F12
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm Straightforward rpm -ivh of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs: olpc-contents python = 2.5 python-json usbmount xs-tools olpc-contents and python-json easily installed by yum. xs-tools requires python 2.5. usbmount installs with the RPM. The packages that need python-2.5 install their files in the wrong place for a python-2.6 system. Daniel ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] problems installing xs-activation on F12
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm Straightforward rpm -ivh of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs: olpc-contents python = 2.5 python-json usbmount xs-tools olpc-contents and python-json easily installed by yum. xs-tools requires python 2.5. usbmount installs with the RPM. The packages that need python-2.5 install their files in the wrong place for a python-2.6 system. Does a recompile of this against a F-12 system not fix the python 2.5 - 2.6 problem? Peter ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] problems installing xs-activation on F12
On 27 April 2010 10:34, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Does a recompile of this against a F-12 system not fix the python 2.5 - 2.6 problem? Probably yes, but not so sure I want to leave such a task in the hands of the deployment here, as this is something that will have to be repeated for time to come. The mail was mostly to inform Martin that its not such a smooth ride as we hoped for in another thread. Daniel ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] problems installing xs-activation on F12
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm On my list for today (together with olpc-bios-crypto). A rebuild of the srpm will probably fail because in the F9 series, the specfile has python path hardcoded. I have an updated spec file with paths reading from rpm macros, together with other spec fixes, already in git. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
[Server-devel] olpc-bios-crypto - relative vs abs symlinks?
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the context of an RPM? (A quick check if my /usr/*bin/ on F9 build box shows a mix of abs and rel). cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] olpc-bios-crypto - relative vs abs symlinks?
On 27 April 2010 11:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the context of an RPM? Can't recall, but I suspect it would have been something in fedora package guidelines, or a complaint from rpmlint. Daniel ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] olpc-bios-crypto - relative vs abs symlinks?
On 27 April 2010 11:51, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 27 April 2010 11:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the context of an RPM? Can't recall, but I suspect it would have been something in fedora package guidelines, or a complaint from rpmlint. Now I recall. I was bringing it (and the spec) in line with normal packaging: In most packaging systems, make install is run with DESTDIR as some build root (in this case, the RPM build root), and then all the files are moved to / during installation. If the symlinks are made absolutely and consider DESTDIR, then they will be broken at time of package installation (still pointing into the RPM build root). Daniel ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] olpc-bios-crypto - relative vs abs symlinks?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Now I recall. I was bringing it (and the spec) in line with normal packaging: Thanks for the clarification. Many Fedora pkgs have abs symlinks though. I can see why it is tricky to differentiate between the target path in the build root and the installed target path. The way I'd done it was yielding the right results ;-) cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
[Server-devel] problema con Instalacion XS
Hola a todos he notado que en algunas computadoras de escritorio especialmente con las DELL esta vez trate de instalar el XS en una DELL y el mensaje que aparece es SELinux: Could not open police file = /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy/policy.23: No such file or directory Unable to load SELinux policy (No such file or directory). Halting now. y lo mas extraño es que cuando le doy la instalación normal no cargar en entorno gráfico del XS para la instalación -- Abrazoss.. Kevin Mauricio Benavides Castro XO and XS Technical Support Member of the Volunteer Group for OLPC and sugarlabs www.wiki.laptop.org/go/user/kevin.benavides http://www.sistemascastros.netne.net/ - Linux User: #12356 ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
