Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Martin Langhoff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Spinning hopefully the last one. > > There's a dev11 now in the server, and I think it's The One. But I'll > formally release it tomorrow, I think :-) > > cheers, > > > m
Well, the upgrade is not painful. The weird thing I found is about yum, $releasever, and fedora-updates.repo, we have two issues.. First with the use of xs-release when I do a "rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/fedora-release" I get back: fedora-release-7-3.noarch xs-release-9-0.4.12.noarch which will confuse the heck out of yum if you have $releasever anywhere. I guess we should have xs-release do: Obsoletes: fedora-release Second, I found the above because I did a "yum repolist" and the fedora-update repo from the F7 install was active. Need to remove that one, maybe from xs-release? Jerry _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
