On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I don't understand your question. Sounds like prefetching that isn't
part of dns (id you perhaps think of DHCP here?)
I don't have my well-worn "DNS and BIND" book with me right now but I
am
jonas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:45:28AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
> >benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
> > > Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > > > The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
> > > > underutilised network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:45:28AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
>benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
> > Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > > The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
> > > underutilised network of peers. They assume that the netwo
Useful to diagnose problems with %post scripts during the build. This patch
adds the method to the ImageCreator class, and the corresponding options to
image-creator and livecd-creator
--
Actually, quite a handy trick when my dodgy %post scripts mess up
during initial/anaconda installs.
cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:08:30PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> DNS-SD using unicast DNS seems reasonable to me too.
>
>If we can do without the avahi gunk, and use it in a way that is not
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dave Bauer wrote:
> I have an online group that contains "@all@"
Good move on the upgrade -- you should also change @all@ to @online.
@all@ is known not to work with that release, and even if it did
work... you really want @online@ instead of @a...@.
cheers,
m
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> DNS-SD using unicast DNS seems reasonable to me too.
If we can do without the avahi gunk, and use it in a way that is not
optimised for user driven browsing but for automated selection of
services, then it might work.
> Looking closer at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
> underutilised network of peers. They assume that the network is a
> cheap resource, that broadcast messages are cheap, and that there is
> no coordinating server.
m
It's old! ejabberd-xs-2.0.3-2.fc9.olpc.i386
I have updated to ejabberd-xs.i386 0:2.0.3-5.fc9.olpc
We can test it again.
I have an online group that contains "@all@"
Thanks.
Dave
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Dave Bauer wrote:
> > I
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Dave Bauer wrote:
> Its jabber.sugarlabs.org aka schoolserver.solutiongrove.com
> ejabberd-xs-2.0.3
> Should be XS 0.5.2
Can you post the complete version string as reported by `rpm -qa
ejabberd-xs` ? I published various 2.0.3's, the early ones had a
broken @onlin
10 matches
Mail list logo
