Re: [Server-devel] Meshnode product...

2009-06-17 Thread s . boutayeb
Selon Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de:

 On 06/15/2009 10:15 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
  Thanks for that Sameer
 
  I'm sure that color scheme isn't accidental :-)
 
  They say it's Debian-based
 
  Simon - Do you think it would be useful or interesting to borrow one
  of these for LinuxTag? Could you or someone on the sugar-devel team
  possibly contact them and see if they are coming, if so (and maybe
  even if not) would they be willing to loan us one? Contact info is
  here: http://saxnet.de/index.php/deutsch/kontakt/buero.html
 

Hi all,

OLPC France had a connection with Steffen Dreise from Saxnet? They wanted to buy
approx. 100 XO for their projects (one in Senegal, I think). They were also in
contact with OLPC Germany and OLPC Austria. They offered us to borrow one unit
for testing purposes.

Samy

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] mkusbinstall link broken?

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Sameer Vermasve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
 I am using mkusbinstall to install xs-0.6d on to a USB stick. I am
 doing this on Ubuntu 9.04 which does not ship udevinfo. I get an error
 of command not found. Ubuntu 9.04 ships udevadm.
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/universe-bugs/2009-March/063219.html

 I had to change udevinfo to udevadm info on line 44 to make it
 work. Thought I'd pass this along.

Good hint! What would a patch look like? ;-)




-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] binding ejabberd on XS

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Vamsi Krishna
Davulurivamsi.davul...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm following this guide http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Installing_Software,
 and i blindly changed the binding address to the
 one given in the link, I changed it again to localhost.localdomain
 and it gives me the following

Oops. Questions

Are you on 0.5.2 or on 0.6? You _should_ be on 0.6 for develppment
purposes, and 0.6 has a completely different install method... which
is described in the same email where I announced the 0.6 alpha
image...

I suggest installing 0.6d2 again and following the (much simpler)
steps for it...


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Firing up ejabberd

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Vamsi Krishna
Davulurivamsi.davul...@gmail.com wrote:
 p.s. the burnt version of 0.6b doesnt work, I tried with two
 writers just to be sure.

- did you check the sha1sum?
- what problem are you having _exactly_?


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] [IAEP] Fwd: An interesting project I stumbled across

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Frederick Grosefgr...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://www.wizzydigital.org/index.html

Wizzy Digital Courier is right in the middle of my longer-term plans.
A quick google shows a few pages I've written in the wiki about it.

Not that I'm original. When I joined OLPC, Jim Gettys toured me over
wwwoffle, WDC, rproxy, hashcache  proxy and a myriad of other things I
had to study.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] the first user is admin moodle policy

2009-06-17 Thread Daniel Drake
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:31 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
  I don't feel that the first user is admin policy in the new XS-0.6 is
  going to agree with deployment procedures that well, especially when you
  are deploying XSes in number.
 
  For example in Paraguay, we installed all the XSes at the office and a
  separate team installed them in the schools. We might want the head of
  the school to be the course creator person, but at that time we haven't
  even assigned him/her a laptop so registering him would be impossible.
 
 I don't follow very well. You either
 
 A - performed the initial choose your name and colour and registered
 the XO to the XS, visited moodle
 
 or
 
 B - didn't.

Option B. We installed the school servers without XOs. Having to use XOs
would be an extra step in an already dull-and-time-consuming process.

 In case A, mark the privileged XO somehow, and ship it with
 instructions that the marked laptop goes to the head of school.

The teachers already had their XOs at this point, so there's no way we
could have possessed the headteacher's XO without someone driving for a
few hours.

 In case B, ship the laptops with instructions that the head of school
 must get the laptop before anyone else and complete the aforementioned
 steps.

This would have been logistically challenging, and we really needed
these things to be under our control.

  How about this instead: Nobody is course creator by default.
  We add a command that can be run by root on the XS
 
 I am not opposed to adding that as an option. But it goes against the
 workflow that I am trying to get to, which is to move _everything_ on
 the XS to a quick webbased configuration.
 
 Right now, my 0.6 alphas only need a single setup command: defining
 the domain. If I move that to a webbased one-time step, no more need
 for cli interaction in mass deployments.
 
 I do intend to add another step (hopefully webbased) to configure WAN.
 With those 2 in place, 99% of mass deployments are covered, AFAICS.

I think this is basically a conflict between the case when you are
installing 1 XS (in which case what you are describing is perfect) vs
10+ of them.

Having to connect up other computers and open web browsers and things is
extra hassle when you know what you're doing and can just run 1 command.
Especially when it's stupidly hot ;) And command-based interfaces can be
more easily automated by the deployments.

 Back to your concerns... after the setup in the warehouse, you ship
 the laptops with absolutely no instructions? Is it reasonable to go
 from Make sure everyone put in their name, chooses colours,
 registers to Do steps as described with the head of school first,
 and ensure he/she logs into moodle ok, then distribute laptops and get
 everyone to do same steps?

In my experience, even with instructions this would not happen according
to plan. It really needs to be in the control of the team doing the
infrastructure.

Everything is always a little chaotic and disorganised when you involve
the school.. and don't overestimate the capabilities of the headteacher.
Those instructions would be pretty hard for a lot of new users.

At least for Paraguay, this system would have just been plain
inconvenient and we'd have had to hack it out before deploying the XSes.
Maybe Paraguay is a one-off and it's perfect for all other deployments
(even big ones), but I personally doubt it.

Daniel


___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] the first user is admin moodle policy

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
 The teachers already had their XOs at this point

The teachers have XOs and the kids don't yet. Correct?

 I think this is basically a conflict between the case when you are
 installing 1 XS (in which case what you are describing is perfect) vs
 10+ of them.

I am still wrapping my head around the workflows applied in each
school to deploy 10+ schools...

 Having to connect up other computers and open web browsers

But... but... OK, these are my assumptions:

1 - You do send a technician (or more) with the XS + AP plus some cabling

2 - The technician will have to open a browser, assoc to the AP, open
Browse.xo and visit the XS homepage as a basic QA step. A technician
cannot leave a school without having tested the connection to the XS
at least _once_.

 3 - As part of #2, the technician registers the XO that will be the
head teacher's machine. If the head teacher already has an XO, the
technician borrows it. Otherwise, the technician grabs a random XO,
registers it, and hands it over with a bit of ceremony to the head.
This is a social thing: the technician should do something to stress
that the XO is special.

 And command-based interfaces can be
 more easily automated by the deployments.

Except that you don't know what to automate. As you said, you don't
know what XO will the head teacher get. What's the SN? UUID?

Here's a possible approach: Right now we can't tag anyone in any role
until they've registered. In fact, early in the installation we don't
really have a complete Moodle DB. So a command in the style you
requested doesn't have much to work on.

On the other hand, if you do know the SN, it would be relatively easy
to make a list of 'blessed' SNs, so

 echo SN1234567B  /etc/moodle/coursecreators

would be a way to handle it. And the presence of that file signals
that the 'first come is coursecreator' feature is immediately
disabled.

 In my experience, even with instructions this would not happen according
 to plan. It really needs to be in the control of the team doing the
 infrastructure.

Or the technician handling the setup @ the school?

Is that still an unreasonable expectation?

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


[Server-devel] Upgrade to 0.6

2009-06-17 Thread Dave Bauer
Is it possible to upgrade from 0.5.2 to 0.6 yet or is it necessary to do a
new install to test it?

Thanks
Dave
-- 
Dave Bauer
d...@solutiongrove.com
http://www.solutiongrove.com
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Upgrade to 0.6

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dave Bauerd...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
 Is it possible to upgrade from 0.5.2 to 0.6 yet or is it necessary to do a
 new install to test it?

Hmmm. I haven't tested an upgrade. I usually

 - develop/test updating via yum  rpm
 - when getting ready to release, first test clean install, then test upgrades

It all depends on how adventurous you are. And how good your backups
are. At this stage, I'm pretty sure something will break, and you'll
want the backup at least to diagnose what changed (and later, rollback
and retest).

cheers,




m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Upgrade to 0.6

2009-06-17 Thread Dave Bauer
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dave Bauerd...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
  Is it possible to upgrade from 0.5.2 to 0.6 yet or is it necessary to do
 a
  new install to test it?

 Hmmm. I haven't tested an upgrade. I usually

  - develop/test updating via yum  rpm
  - when getting ready to release, first test clean install, then test
 upgrades

 It all depends on how adventurous you are. And how good your backups
 are. At this stage, I'm pretty sure something will break, and you'll
 want the backup at least to diagnose what changed (and later, rollback
 and retest).

 cheers,


Thanks.

For now I think setting up a seperate install to try out 0.6 is the best
bet, and when its closer to ready, we can make a backup and test the
upgrade.

Dave




 m
 --
  martin.langh...@gmail.com
  mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
  - ask interesting questions
  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff




-- 
Dave Bauer
d...@solutiongrove.com
http://www.solutiongrove.com
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Saludos desde Nicaragua, OLPC SERVER

2009-06-17 Thread Rodolfo D. Arce S.
Hola desde Paraguay

We're going to continue this convesation in english so others may
understand.. we have some instructions in this page for you to look at,
they're in spanish and parts in english, hope it works out for you, its
based on XS version 0.5.2

http://wiki.paraguayeduca.org/index.php/Servidor

you can skip the parts about puppet or the FQDN naming, the rest is standard
for any schoolserver installation

saludos.. R

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Kevin Benavides 
kbenavi...@americancollege.edu.ni wrote:

 Hola como estan soy de Nicaragua all here in my country is carried out
 by the OLPC project but would like to know if you have a video of
 installation of the server and which lower the vercion 5.0 website
 that told me about their experiences of this software

 --
 Kevin Mauricio Benavides Castro
 American College
 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


[Server-devel] Thanks for the information

2009-06-17 Thread Kevin Benavides
Thanks for the information, but I doubt the server can install any
Linux distribution in this case fedora 10 and configure it to filter
the information pages as unfair to the children not to enter these
sites or necessarily install vercion of schoolserver

--
Kevin Mauricio Benavides Castro
American College
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Saludos desde Nicaragua, OLPC SERVER

2009-06-17 Thread Rodolfo D. Arce S.
I didn't fully understand what you said..

The main installation doesn't filter anything.. i think :S..it does
use a squid proxy, but no blocking

we later added squidGuard to do the redirection, you can look it up in
our wiki, we added squidGuard because of our commitment to the
educational usage of internet and also because of legislation

saludos.. R



On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Kevin
Benavideskbenavi...@americancollege.edu.ni wrote:
 Thanks for the information, but I doubt the server can install any Linux
 distribution in this case fedora 10 and configure it to filter the
 information pages as unfair to the children not to enter these sites or
 necessarily install vercion of schoolserver


 --
 Kevin Mauricio Benavides Castro
 American College

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Saludos desde Nicaragua, OLPC SERVER

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Rodolfo D. Arce
S.rodolfoa...@eyuhoo.com wrote:
\ The main installation doesn't filter anything.. i think :S..it does
 use a squid proxy, but no blocking

Yes. Strategies for filtering have been discussed on the list before.
Using google to search the archives is the way:

http://www.google.be/search?q=site%3Alists.laptop.org%2Fpipermail%2Fserver-devel+filteringie=utf-8hl=en

cheers,




m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] suggestion

2009-06-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
Have you tried searching the archives? Fedora-11 and  F-11 are
good keywords ;-)


m

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Kevin
Benavideskbenavi...@americancollege.edu.ni wrote:
 Well the information provided is very helpful but what I trying to say is
 that if you need to install the server vercion OLPC on a server X to
 remember that while the OLPC operating system Server is based on free
 software, and I ask is that if you can inslatalar operating system is fedora
 11 (leonidas) is linux and install a server and mount Squit to filter the
 content desired by the administrator of the server.

 I ask because I would imagine that the same .

 not like you are there for such advance is in the OLPC project

 but do not know if the project fedora 11 (leonidas) will attach the link to
 visit the website:
 http://fedoraproject.org/es/index

 All that is in Spanish

 --
 Kevin Mauricio Benavides Castro
 American College

 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel





-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel