http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
Straightforward rpm -ivh of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs:
olpc-contents
python = 2.5
python-json
usbmount
xs-tools
olpc-contents and python-json easily installed by yum.
xs-tools
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
Straightforward rpm -ivh of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs:
olpc-contents
python = 2.5
python-json
usbmount
On 27 April 2010 10:34, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Does a recompile of this against a F-12 system not fix the python 2.5
- 2.6 problem?
Probably yes, but not so sure I want to leave such a task in the hands
of the deployment here, as this is something that will have to be
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
On my list for today (together with olpc-bios-crypto). A rebuild of
the srpm will probably fail because in the F9 series, the
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the
obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the
context of an RPM?
(A quick check if my /usr/*bin/ on F9 build box shows a mix of abs and rel).
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org
On 27 April 2010 11:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the
obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the
context of an RPM?
Can't recall, but I suspect it would have been something in
On 27 April 2010 11:51, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 27 April 2010 11:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the
obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the
context of an RPM?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Now I recall. I was bringing it (and the spec) in line with normal
packaging:
Thanks for the clarification. Many Fedora pkgs have abs symlinks though.
I can see why it is tricky to differentiate between the target path in
Hola a todos
he notado que en algunas computadoras de escritorio especialmente con las
DELL
esta vez trate de instalar el XS en una DELL y el mensaje que aparece es
SELinux: Could not open police file =
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy/policy.23: No such file or directory
Unable to load