On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:23 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Metrics can direct action.
>
> Unfortunately, in the absence of meaningful metrics, the meaningless
> metrics will also direct action.
>
True. In fact, the reliability of the whole thing is dependent on the
reliability of the generated data.
Thanks Sameer, fyi George's XO-4 should arrive by Tues.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, George Hunt wrote:
> > On our skype call Thursday, Jon suggested using the XO4 config file as a
> > base for getting all the needed kernel capability. A
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, George Hunt wrote:
> On our skype call Thursday, Jon suggested using the XO4 config file as a
> base for getting all the needed kernel capability. And James suggested
> looking at the upstream kernel conf. In any case I'll need to understand,
> and merge in, whatev
Jon,
Do you have a github url that includes the changes that you have made to
3.10.17 -- which I assume you lifted from
http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/tag/?id=rel_imx_3.10.17_1.0.0_beta
.
Now that Tim is scheduled to get his Cubox's, it seems like we should be
aiming
Thanks James
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:06 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 06:47:25PM -0500, George Hunt wrote:
> > Can I ask someone to email me the XO4 /boot/conf* file. I'm not at
> > home, and I didn't bring an ARM XO with me to California. I would
> > love to get XSCE to
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 06:47:25PM -0500, George Hunt wrote:
> Can I ask someone to email me the XO4 /boot/conf* file. I'm not at
> home, and I didn't bring an ARM XO with me to California. I would
> love to get XSCE to load, without erroring out, on a Cubox.
Link rather than mail.
http://dev.lap
On our skype call Thursday, Jon suggested using the XO4 config file as a
base for getting all the needed kernel capability. And James suggested
looking at the upstream kernel conf. In any case I'll need to understand,
and merge in, whatever special conig Rebeeh put in for the SOC in the Cubox.
I
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Martin Abente
wrote:
> Hello Sameer,
>
> I totally agree we should join efforts for a visualization solution, but,
> personally, my main concern is still a basic one: what are the important
> questions we should be asking? And how can we answer these questions
> re
