On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Dan Poltawski talkto...@gmail.com wrote:
One slight drawback to this approach is that it does conflict with the goal
of eventually rebasing onto Moodle 2.0. In Moodle 2.0 the complete file layer
has been rewritten which means some of the work would be of
Hi Martin,
I am aware of what Moodle can do but disagree that file access should always
be through it. It's much easy to go straight to the folders of content
rather than having to log on and enrol on courses etc. Much of the time in
the way I see teachers using the server they won't be working
Leeming
Technical Advisor, People First Network, Honiara, Solomon Islands
Alternative email address: leemingda...@yahoo.com.au
From: Anna [mailto:ascho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 17 January 2009 5:08 a.m.
To: Martin Langhoff
Cc: David Leeming; XS Devel
Subject: Re: [Server-devel] Browsing
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:00 AM, David Leeming
leem...@pipolfastaem.gov.sb wrote:
With version 0.4 and 0.5.0 I was able to browse the server html folders,
i.e. the default for the link on the XO browser to Local School Server
with 0.4 took you to
/var/www/html
With version 0.5, the default
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is an alternative you can also use - less moodle-centric, and
may be unsupported going forward
1 - create a new directory: /var/www/mylocalcontent , put your files there
2 - add a new apache config
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
Since, at least for now, we're not going to be using moodle in Birmingham
yet, I renamed
you break my heart with that, but it's a valid
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm very sorry, Martin, but I hope you understand the reasoning behind the
decision.
I was part-joking, didn't mean to make you feel back... it turns out I
did undestand in general terms why; but your email is very valuable in
