Re: [Server-devel] Raspberry Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

2016-02-10 Thread Adam Holt
Thanks Peter Robinson, Paul Fox and Dogi Unterhauser for your illuminating 2016's evolving and very promising options- Preliminary conclusion is that we are buying a few $29 http://pine64.com (includes 2GB RAM) to experiment with. What is the best mailing list to discuss Fedora (or non-Fedora)

Re: [Server-devel] Raspberry Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

2016-02-07 Thread Adam Holt
On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > things like > the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not storage. Both SATA (real TB+ disks) and Ethernet (external Wi-Fi AP antennae) are icing-on-the-cake we will both strongly consider. > As is stands at the

Re: [Server-devel] Raspberry Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

2016-02-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: >> things like >> the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not storage. > > Both SATA (real TB+ disks) and Ethernet (external Wi-Fi AP antennae) are

Re: [Server-devel] Raspberry Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

2016-02-07 Thread Adam Holt
On Feb 7, 2016 9:59 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > >> things like > >> the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not