Re: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Tim Moody timmo...@sympatico.ca wrote: What are the main advantages of wwwoffle over apache's built in proxy and cache modules? I concur with all of Wad's points. The problems with have with Squid are well known (search this list archive for sad stories about

Re: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent Internet - WWWOFFLE installation Guide on 0.6 XS Server

2010-04-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Andra Fantastic! Thanks! Couple questions: - Can we remove the need to set proxy on every XO by either... - using a transparent proxy, same as we do with SQUID (maybe make a TURN_ON_WWWOFFLE script)? - serving a proxy autoconfig file via dhcp/apache? - Is it viable to automate the go

Re: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent

2010-04-09 Thread Tim Moody
What are the main advantages of wwwoffle over apache's built in proxy and cache modules? Message: 3 Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 23:46:52 -0400 From: Andra DuPont andradup...@gmail.com Subject: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent Internet - WWWOFFLE installation Guide on 0.6 XS

Re: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent

2010-04-09 Thread John Watlington
: [Server-devel] Web Caching for Areas with Intermittent Internet - WWWOFFLE installation Guide on 0.6 XS Server To: XS Devel server-devel@lists.laptop.org Message-ID: 8959cbcb-d54b-4fb6-996a-e4a403dc9...@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Squid apparently is not well suited