Re: [Server-devel] XS-0.7 CentOS6.2 rebase - other pending items

2012-02-10 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > For users that install CentOS and *then* install our stuff, we may > need to add a warning if we don't see our custom revision prefix. It's > gotta be a soft warning 'cause we don't really know if it's wrong or > not. I'll check that in xs

Re: [Server-devel] XS-0.7 CentOS6.2 rebase - other pending items

2012-02-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests. > Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a > test release: > > ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package > as

Re: [Server-devel] XS-0.7 CentOS6.2 rebase - other pending items

2012-02-10 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests. > Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a > test release: Great news. > ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package >

[Server-devel] XS-0.7 CentOS6.2 rebase - other pending items

2012-02-09 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests. Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a test release: ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package as 'ejabberd' or 'ejabberd-xs' to move forward. Once that is done, I wi