Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5 Second Attempt at eth1

2008-12-05 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Jerry Vonau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anna wrote: So, what are the repercussions of this? Not sure... Martin? Good sleuthing! Bonding-related errors was the last thing I'd imagined, and with the e1000 driver too -- it's widely used and generally well maintained.

Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5 Second Attempt at eth1

2008-12-05 Thread Anna
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Anna, what's your NIC? Ideally, we want to know the marketing make/name/model and what lspci reports for it. Perhaps I can get my hands on the same hw you have. I'm currently testing on two machines. They're both circa

Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5 Second Attempt at eth1

2008-12-05 Thread Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
I was hit by the same problem last week.. ARP works but no ping nor IP messages seem to get through. I am far away from the server now but I think the NIC was a CNet. On Vie, 5 de Diciembre de 2008, 12:34 pm, Reuben K. Caron wrote: Now that I have DHCPD running on a clean install. I can report

Re: [Server-devel] Server-devel Digest, Vol 20, Issue 7

2008-12-05 Thread Eroni Tuiloma
with the Dell GX270, because our deployment got hold of a couple dozen of them to use as XS's. Anna Schoolfield Birmingham -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/attachments/20081205/70c8d5d9/attachment