Hi,
What build are you running? Registration updates config in early builds
and updates gconf in recent builds. In gconf, registration creates an
entry in /home/olpc/.gconf/desktop/sugar/%gconf.xml. This is used by the
backup procedure to recognize that the laptop is registered. In earlier
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 13:15 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
XS 0.7
OLPC build 874
Sugar 0.92.2
The XO fails to register, but a folder is created for the XO
On 6/4/2012 3:27 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jerry Vonaujvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 13:15 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Vermasve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
XS 0.7
OLPC build 874
Sugar 0.92.2
The XO fails to register,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Holt h...@laptop.org wrote:
One XO-1.5 successfully registered back on Saturday. It successfully then
pushed 36MB to the XS' /library/users/SHC03801C2E (after running
/usr/bin/ds-backup.sh on the XO-1.5 and waiting ~30min). So we went home
Saturday night with
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
using any of them.Perhaps you meant 172.18.nn.nn ?
And I never got around to the second part of the comment.
eth0 (the WAN port) on
On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
using any of them.Perhaps you meant 172.18.nn.nn ?
Wad's exactly right -- I spent too
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:35 PM, John Watlington wrote:
I suspect that your ISP is assigning 172.18.196.1 to the
XS, which is then confused as to where packets destined
for 172.18.xx.xx should be routed.
eth0 and the other interfaces on the XS should be in separate
subnets.
BTW, if this is
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
using any of them.Perhaps you meant
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:41 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:35 PM, John Watlington wrote:
I suspect that your ISP is assigning 172.18.196.1 to the
XS, which is then confused as to where packets destined
for 172.18.xx.xx should be routed.
eth0 and the other
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 17:49 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Adam, something is
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 17:49 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 4,
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 18:16 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
snip
Adam:
OK, let's check if the XS has the serial numbers, what is the output of
/usr/bin/xs-list-registration? If that shows as correct the XOs timed
out like in
13 matches
Mail list logo
