AW: AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned]

2015-03-29 Thread Bernd Waibel
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Jerry Malcolm techst...@malcolms.com Datum: 28.03.2015 17:53 (GMT+01:00) An: James Users List server-user@james.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned] Hi Bernd, Thanks for the response. Here's the problem scenario

Re: AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned]

2015-03-28 Thread Jerry Malcolm
[mailto:bwai...@intarsys.de] Gesendet: Samstag, 14. März 2015 00:07 An: James Users List Betreff: AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned] Hello Jerry, just a few thoughts about alternatives (not sure I got your problem). Why don't use a database sequence field or AUTO_INCREMENT field

AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned]

2015-03-13 Thread Bernd Waibel
Hello Jerry, just a few thoughts about alternatives (not sure I got your problem). Why don't use a database sequence field or AUTO_INCREMENT field, instead of a UUID? And let the database handle the UUID creation? But if you would like to use UUIDs: Make sure it is not part of a race

AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned]

2015-03-13 Thread Bernd Waibel
: Samstag, 14. März 2015 00:07 An: James Users List Betreff: AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned] Hello Jerry, just a few thoughts about alternatives (not sure I got your problem). Why don't use a database sequence field or AUTO_INCREMENT field, instead of a UUID? And let the database

AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned]

2015-03-13 Thread Bernd Waibel
Hello Jerry, a very good question. I would like to tell my opinion, not sure if I could help. We use James v2.3.2. We currently do not use the mailboxes, but anyway. We develop with James. Some time ago we moved our old mail system (postfix based) to a new mail system (MS Exchange). Because

Re: AW: Tracking Mail After Folder Moves [unsigned]

2015-03-13 Thread Benoit Tellier
Le 13/03/2015 17:36, Bernd Waibel a écrit : I am not firm with IMAP, is there a move operation? If the move operation is implemented as a delete and create operation, the identity will be lost. Is it possible to implement the move operation as a database renaming operation, to keep the