List
Subject: Re: JAMES Administration
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> However, in James 2.2.0 and the upcoming 2.3 release, the support for
> JMX within James is limited.
>
> But, work has started to put more management operations in. This can
> currently be found in source code only
On 7/25/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> However, in James 2.2.0 and the upcoming 2.3 release, the support for
> JMX within James is limited.
>
> But, work has started to put more management operations in. This can
> currently be found in source code only (
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
However, in James 2.2.0 and the upcoming 2.3 release, the support for
JMX within James is limited.
But, work has started to put more management operations in. This can
currently be found in source code only (in the "trunk"). It covers
more or less all operations already a
Im looking forward to maybe include the jmx stuff in 2.4. For the
installer its maybe hard cause alter config files is mostly not so easy.
Im not sure if it will maybe "easier" after we switch to commons
configuration.
bye
Norman
Am Dienstag, den 25.07.2006, 11:15 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
Hi,
Mark, thanks for bringing this topic on the table.
In the Java world, JMX (Java Management Extensions) is the weapon of
choice for the use cases you are describing. (see
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jmx/index.html)
However, in James 2.2.0 and the upcoming 2.3 release, the suppo
Recently I have switched my JAMES implementation over to "virtual users"
using MySQL backend via JDBCVirtualUserTable, my AV over to ClamAV (away
from McAfee) and all spam checking via SpamAssassin. Apart from users, all
storage is file based. This setup is going really well.
I am interested in wh
Hi Folks,
Thanks for your great interest in the James
Administration Web Application (Screenshot at http://www.sportdaten.info/webjam.jpg).
I hope everyone who requested the war-File has got it
by now, write me, if not. Good ideas for extending the webapp are appreciated
