Re: Replacement for javax.mail?

2013-05-17 Thread Eric Charles
Hi James, No, The James protocols projects are for server-side implementations. Everyone is welcome to contribute to let them evolve as both server and client side implementations. Thx, Eric On 17/05/2013 01:51, James Cook wrote: I know James is a Mail /server/ implementation, but I'm

Re: Replacement for javax.mail?

2013-05-17 Thread Matthieu Baechler
Hi James, I have the exact same need and I evaluated every libraries I found to replace javax.mail. My conclusion is that no implementation is good enough for my project and we decided to stick with our own implementation of IMAP protocol which is very limited but that we are able to enhance