Re: How can I remove the admin module?
Hello Martijn, Yes removing the TaskManagerModule should work. You can only start admin tasks via wedadmin anyways. So if you don't use them, it is safe I believe to remove. Best regards, Rene. On 28/06/2023 21:49, martijn brinkers wrote: I think I have found it. I also had to disable the TaskManager module: private static final Module PROTOCOLS = Modules.combine( new ProtocolHandlerModule(), new SMTPServerModule(), //new WebAdminServerModule(), //new DataRoutesModules(), //new MailRepositoriesRoutesModule(), //new MailQueueRoutesModule(), //new NoJwtModule(), new DefaultProcessorsConfigurationProviderModule() //new TaskManagerModule() ); On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:27 PM martijn brinkers wrote: Hi, I'm trying to create a James server (I'm using release 3.8) without the admin module. Main reason for this is that I want a minimal system. As an experiement I created a copy of the jpa-smtp-app and then tried to remove modules related to the webadmin. It works if I disable some admin modules. However disabling the DataRoutesModules results in a runtime error when trying to start the application. From JPAJamesServerMain: private static final Module PROTOCOLS = Modules.combine( new ProtocolHandlerModule(), new SMTPServerModule(), //new WebAdminServerModule(), //new DataRoutesModules(), //new MailRepositoriesRoutesModule(), //new MailQueueRoutesModule(), //new NoJwtModule(), new DefaultProcessorsConfigurationProviderModule(), new TaskManagerModule()); With the admin modules commented out, compilation works. However at runtime the folllowing error is shown: 16:19:18.519 [ERROR] o.a.j.GuiceJamesServer - Fatal error while starting James com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the following errors: 1) [Guice/MissingImplementation]: No implementation for Set> was bound. Did you mean? Set> annotated with @Named(value="additional_information_dto") bound at TaskSerializationModule.provideAdditionalInformationDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:60) \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> TaskSerializationModule Requested by: 1 : TaskSerializationModule.provideAdditionalInformationDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:60) \_ for 1st parameter at TaskSerializationModule.provideAdditionalInformationDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:60) \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> TaskSerializationModule Learn more: https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/MISSING_IMPLEMENTATION 2) [Guice/MissingImplementation]: No implementation for Set> was bound. Did you mean? Set> annotated with @Named(value="task_dto") bound at TaskSerializationModule.provideTaskDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:83) \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> TaskSerializationModule Requested by: 1 : TaskSerializationModule.provideTaskDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:83) \_ for 1st parameter at TaskSerializationModule.provideTaskDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:83) \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> TaskSerializationModule If I only enable DataRoutesModules, the above error is not shown. private static final Module PROTOCOLS = Modules.combine( new ProtocolHandlerModule(), new SMTPServerModule(), //new WebAdminServerModule(), new DataRoutesModules(), //new MailRepositoriesRoutesModule(), //new MailQueueRoutesModule(), //new NoJwtModule(), new DefaultProcessorsConfigurationProviderModule(), new TaskManagerModule()); The DataRoutesModules however pull in spark-core via a dependency (and therefore also jetty etc) which I would like to prevent. What I do not understand is that it looks like "Set>" is provided by TaskSerializationModule and TaskSerializationModule is installed by TaskManagerModule. It therefore looks like there is an implementation available. Any suggestion on how I can complete remove the web admin (and it's dependencies). Kind regards, Martijn Brinkers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
Re: How can I remove the admin module?
I think I have found it. I also had to disable the TaskManager module: private static final Module PROTOCOLS = Modules.combine( new ProtocolHandlerModule(), new SMTPServerModule(), //new WebAdminServerModule(), //new DataRoutesModules(), //new MailRepositoriesRoutesModule(), //new MailQueueRoutesModule(), //new NoJwtModule(), new DefaultProcessorsConfigurationProviderModule() //new TaskManagerModule() ); On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:27 PM martijn brinkers wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to create a James server (I'm using release 3.8) without the > admin module. Main reason for this is that I want a minimal system. > > As an experiement I created a copy of the jpa-smtp-app and then tried to > remove modules related to the webadmin. > > It works if I disable some admin modules. However disabling the > DataRoutesModules results in a runtime error when trying to start the > application. > > From JPAJamesServerMain: > > private static final Module PROTOCOLS = Modules.combine( > new ProtocolHandlerModule(), > new SMTPServerModule(), > //new WebAdminServerModule(), > //new DataRoutesModules(), > //new MailRepositoriesRoutesModule(), > //new MailQueueRoutesModule(), > //new NoJwtModule(), > new DefaultProcessorsConfigurationProviderModule(), > new TaskManagerModule()); > > With the admin modules commented out, compilation works. However at > runtime the folllowing error is shown: > > > 16:19:18.519 [ERROR] o.a.j.GuiceJamesServer - Fatal error while starting > James > com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the > following errors: > > 1) [Guice/MissingImplementation]: No implementation for > Set TaskExecutionDetails$AdditionalInformation, ? extends > AdditionalInformationDTO>> was bound. > > Did you mean? > Set TaskExecutionDetails$AdditionalInformation, ? extends > AdditionalInformationDTO>> annotated with > @Named(value="additional_information_dto") bound at > TaskSerializationModule.provideAdditionalInformationDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:60) > \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> > Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> > TaskSerializationModule > > Requested by: > 1 : > TaskSerializationModule.provideAdditionalInformationDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:60) > \_ for 1st parameter > at > TaskSerializationModule.provideAdditionalInformationDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:60) > \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> > Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> > TaskSerializationModule > > Learn more: > https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/MISSING_IMPLEMENTATION > > 2) [Guice/MissingImplementation]: No implementation for > Set> was bound. > > Did you mean? > Set> annotated with > @Named(value="task_dto") bound at > TaskSerializationModule.provideTaskDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:83) > \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> > Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> > TaskSerializationModule > > Requested by: > 1 : > TaskSerializationModule.provideTaskDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:83) > \_ for 1st parameter > at > TaskSerializationModule.provideTaskDTOModules(TaskSerializationModule.java:83) > \_ installed by: Modules$OverrideModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> > Modules$CombinedModule -> Modules$CombinedModule -> TaskManagerModule -> > TaskSerializationModule > > If I only enable DataRoutesModules, the above error is not shown. > > private static final Module PROTOCOLS = Modules.combine( > new ProtocolHandlerModule(), > new SMTPServerModule(), > //new WebAdminServerModule(), > new DataRoutesModules(), > //new MailRepositoriesRoutesModule(), > //new MailQueueRoutesModule(), > //new NoJwtModule(), > new DefaultProcessorsConfigurationProviderModule(), > new TaskManagerModule()); > > The DataRoutesModules however pull in spark-core via a dependency (and > therefore also jetty etc) which I would like to prevent. > > What I do not understand is that it looks like > "Set TaskExecutionDetails$AdditionalInformation, ? extends > AdditionalInformationDTO>>" is provided by TaskSerializationModule and > TaskSerializationModule is installed by TaskManagerModule. It therefore > looks like there is an implementation available. > > Any suggestion on how I can complete remove the web admin (and it's > dependencies). > > Kind regards, > > Martijn Brinkers >
