Changeset: 856cc9e97aea
Author:darcy
Date: 2011-03-31 19:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/856cc9e97aea
7005628: Clarify NPE behavior of Throwable.addSuppressed(null)
Reviewed-by: dholmes, mchung, jjb
! src/share/classes/java/lang/ArithmeticException.java
! s
Daniel D. Daugherty said the following on 04/01/11 11:27:
On 3/31/2011 7:10 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
If this looks ok, it needs a bug ID and then pushing to JPRT by some
friendly Oracle HotSpot developer :-).
Actually, I think we can use the following bug ID:
7010849 5/5 Extrane
On 3/31/2011 7:10 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
If this looks ok, it needs a bug ID and then pushing to JPRT by some
friendly Oracle HotSpot developer :-).
Actually, I think we can use the following bug ID:
7010849 5/5 Extraneous javac source/target options when building sa-jdi
if Da
On 31/03/2011, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> On 3/30/2011 7:08 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> Ok, what's the best tree to post it against? I don't see a
>>> serviceability tree, so I guess it'll be a HotSpot one...
>>>
>>>
>> The runtime forest (http://hg.openjdk.java.
Changeset: b025bffd6c2c
Author:dholmes
Date: 2011-03-31 06:54 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/b025bffd6c2c
7032775: Include Shark code in the build again
Reviewed-by: ohair
Contributed-by: gben...@redhat.com, ahug...@redhat.com
! make/linux/makefil
Changeset: 683957148bab
Author:michaelm
Date: 2011-03-31 17:37 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/683957148bab
7032866: Problem with fix for 7030256
Reviewed-by: alanb
! src/windows/native/java/net/net_util_md.c
I'm OK with it and, in fact, I recommend doing the incremental
improvement via 7007254 and leaving 5049313 for another day.
Tomas and I IM'ed about it yesterday.
Dan
On 3/31/2011 9:20 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
It's ok with me, but I'm not in the Serviceability team anymore.
Make sure Dan i
It's ok with me, but I'm not in the Serviceability team anymore.
Make sure Dan is ok with it, or at least knows about it.
-kto
On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Tomas Hurka wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to resubmit this code review. I had the private discussion with
> Dan Daugherty and we agreed that
Hi,
I would like to resubmit this code review. I had the private discussion with
Dan Daugherty and we agreed that it would be good to integrate the current fix
I proposed below. Our reasoning is as follow:
1) It fixes the reported problem
2) The fix is not intended to address 5049313 (which talks
Changeset: 677234770800
Author:dsamersoff
Date: 2011-03-30 19:38 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/677234770800
7017193: Small memory leak in get_stack_bounds os::create_stack_guard_pages
Summary: getline() returns -1 but still allocate memory for str
10 matches
Mail list logo