On 3/11/2011 6:14 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 11/2/11 1:29 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
This change is both a build change and a serviceability change, but I
would argue that it is more
of a build change since the functionality of the jvmti demos shouldn't
have changed with this.
Although I am
On 11/2/11 1:30 PM, Keith McGuigan wrote:
Didn't Dan Dougherty review this too? Is he a "reviewer" for this
project? If it helps you can put me down as a reviewer (kamg).
I reviewed an earlier version of the changes. And I just
reviewed the latest version also so I can also be listed
as a r
On 11/2/11 1:29 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
This change is both a build change and a serviceability change, but I would
argue that it is more
of a build change since the functionality of the jvmti demos shouldn't have
changed with this.
Although I am listed as a member of the serviceability "group
Didn't Dan Dougherty review this too? Is he a "reviewer" for this
project? If it helps you can put me down as a reviewer (kamg).
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:07 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
Hi Neil,
My understanding is that you need to have at le
This change is both a build change and a serviceability change, but I would
argue that it is more
of a build change since the functionality of the jvmti demos shouldn't have
changed with this.
Although I am listed as a member of the serviceability "group", I'm not exactly
sure who leads that
gr
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:07 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> My understanding is that you need to have at least two reviewers who
> have 'reviewer' privilege, (and I don't have 'reviewer' privilege).
>
I had a quick leaf through the OpenJDK Bylaws.
It looks like the number of necessary
Hi Neil,
My understanding is that you need to have at least two reviewers who
have 'reviewer' privilege, (and I don't have 'reviewer' privilege).
Yes, I am tied up, if you can handle the push, that will be great. What
java bug id you need? can you use CR 6988099?
BTW, here is the link to al
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:21 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Looks good.
>
>
> -kto
>
Hi Zhengyu,
Given Kelly's blessing, are you now happy to push this change to jdk8?
(If you're otherwise tied up, I can drive the mechanics of the push if
you provide me with a suitable java bug id to use.)
Regar
