Gentle reminder!
Thanks,
Jini.
On 2/14/2018 2:37 PM, Jini George wrote:
Hello,
(Including the SVC and GC groups)
Requesting reviews for enabling the clhsdb 'universe' command to print
out the various G1 regions (along with the type).
JIRA ID:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175312
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198732
Can you please review?
Mandy
On 2/23/18 4:50 PM, mandy chung wrote:
Webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk11/webrevs/8198253/webrev.01
This patch updates the spec to clarify what attributes are required
since which release.
The two-step send came in with:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6401245
"Small JDWP packets with the socket transport causes slow debugging on
linux 2.6.15 kernel and newer"
David
-
On 27/02/2018 9:29 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2/26/18 15:06, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 2/26/18 4:23 PM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
Hi Mandy,
Thanks for taking this on! I'm happy to see that you are happy to do
cleanups I was too timid to do (like adding the Factory in the tests).
I note a few places in the test code where static initializers can
throw RuntimeExceptions. When
Okay, I'll find time at some point to tinker with it. I'm going to wait
until Mandy lands the fix to JDK-8198253, though.
Jeremy
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> I am. :)
>
>
>
> The process is to file an RFE and then a CSR associated with it. You file
> the CSR from th
On 2/26/18 15:06, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 2/26/18 3:00 PM, daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2/26/18 12:16 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 2/26/18 11:51 AM, daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David and Sergei,
On 2/20/18 10:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 2/20/18 20:
On 2/26/18 3:00 PM, daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2/26/18 12:16 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 2/26/18 11:51 AM, daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David and Sergei,
On 2/20/18 10:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 2/20/18 20:02, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Daniil,
Goo
On 2/26/18 12:16 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 2/26/18 11:51 AM, daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David and Sergei,
On 2/20/18 10:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 2/20/18 20:02, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Daniil,
Good find on this!
What does the actual spec say about t
Hi all,
Please review a fix for
JDK-8193369: post_field_access does not work for some functions,
possibly related to fast_getfield
The fix disables "fast" command generation when FieldAccess or
FieldModification notifications are requested.
jira: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-819
Happy to see this get done (ahead of when I can get to it) feel
free to take the JBS backport back into your name Christoph.
s.
On 2/26/18 11:22 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
I'm not sure the old code was doing anything useful by essentially checking
for jdwpMajor == 0. When was it ever zero?
Chri
On 2/26/18 11:51 AM, daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David and Sergei,
On 2/20/18 10:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 2/20/18 20:02, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Daniil,
Good find on this!
What does the actual spec say about the length of things and how
they may be spli
Hi David and Sergei,
On 2/20/18 10:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 2/20/18 20:02, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Daniil,
Good find on this!
What does the actual spec say about the length of things and how they
may be split across multiple packets? Are we guaranteed that at mo
I'm not sure the old code was doing anything useful by essentially
checking for jdwpMajor == 0. When was it ever zero?
Chris
On 2/26/18 2:28 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I think the new code is wrong for "jdwpMajor == 0", which was
correctly handled before.
But I'm not sure if tha
On 2/26/18 3:35 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Mandy,
Nice to see this fixed.
In ThreadInfoCompositeData::initV6CompositeType
425 if (name.equals(STACK_TRACE)) {
426 ot = new ArrayType<>(1,
StackTraceElementCompositeData.v5CompositeType());
427
Hi Paul,
a couple of comments on the patch:
- memoryService.hpp:
+ 150 bool countCollection,
+ 151 bool allMemoryPoolsAffected = true);
There is no need to use a default value for the parameter
allMemoryPoolsAffected here. Skipping the default value a
Hi Mandy,
Nice to see this fixed.
In ThreadInfoCompositeData::initV6CompositeType
425 if (name.equals(STACK_TRACE)) {
426 ot = new ArrayType<>(1,
StackTraceElementCompositeData.v5CompositeType());
427 } else if (name.equals(LO
Hi Christoph,
I think the new code is wrong for "jdwpMajor == 0", which was
correctly handled before.
But I'm not sure if that is relevant at all nowadays and taking into
account that this is a verbatim downport from 9 I don't think we have
to do better in 8u.
Otherwise looks good from my side.
17 matches
Mail list logo
