Hi David,
Thank you for the explanation. From Java 9, there is the 'jhsdb' tool
provided with the JDK, with which you can use the SA features. So, in
this case, you can run it thus to see if you can reproduce the problem:
jhsdb jstack --core --exe
Thanks,
Jini.
On 2/2/2019 2:59 PM, Davi
Hi Lin,
Thank you for the fix!
It looks good in general.
Should it come with a unit test for new flags?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8215622/webrev.06/src/jdk.jcmd/share/classes/sun/tools/jmap/JMap.java.frames.html
154 // get the canonical path - important to avoid just
155 // passing
On 5/02/2019 10:17 pm, Gary Adams wrote:
On 2/4/19, 8:04 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Gary,
On 5/02/2019 12:01 am, Gary Adams wrote:
Two of the redefine classes tests (021, 023) have been on the
ProblemList since they
were first brought into the open repos. Both tests made an incorrect
assumpti
On 6/02/2019 12:01 am, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
Lin's OOTO (Chinese New Year) but pinged me to say that his company's OCA name is
"Beijing Wodong Tianjun Information Technology Co. Ltd. - OpenJDK", which is
on the list. Felix Yang (typo in the name, sorry) is a co-worker.
Thanks for the info Pa
On 2/5/19 5:55 PM, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> The stack trace you sent below is incomplete, it's missing the frame for
> Spinner.run (i.e. the AARCH64Frame object corresponding to the native wrapper
> frame). Did you try on x86 or with the patch I posted? I'm not able to test
>
Hi Andrew,
I followed the same steps as the serviceabilty/sa/ClhsdbJstack.java test. You
can see this failing in Linaro's results here:
http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/builds/release/2019/028/JTwork-hotspot/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbJstack.jtr
The stack trace you sent b
On 2/1/19 9:22 AM, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> On AArch64, if you use "jhsdb clhsdb --pid=..." to attach a debugger to
> a Java process, and then run "jstack -v" while any thread is executing a
> native method, you will get a NullPointerException like this:
This does not happen f
Hi Paul,
I'll review the CSR.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 2/5/19 06:02, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
Looks good to me. David, who should review the CSR? Is there someone who "owns" jmap or perhaps the serviceability group lead
On 2/1/19 9:22 AM, Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> On AArch64, if you use "jhsdb clhsdb --pid=..." to attach a debugger to
> a Java process, and then run "jstack -v" while any thread is executing a
> native method, you will get a NullPointerException like this:
This does not happen f
Looks good to me. David, who should review the CSR? Is there someone who "owns"
jmap or perhaps the serviceability group lead if there is such a person?
Thanks,
Paul
On 1/30/19, 10:43 PM, "臧琳" wrote:
Hi David, Paul,
I have uploaded the refined webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.
Lin's OOTO (Chinese New Year) but pinged me to say that his company's OCA name
is "Beijing Wodong Tianjun Information Technology Co. Ltd. - OpenJDK", which
is on the list. Felix Yang (typo in the name, sorry) is a co-worker.
Paul
On 2/5/19, 3:57 AM, "David Holmes" wrote:
On 5/02/2019 9:
Yes, I can do that. Thank you for reviewing this!
Coleen
On 2/5/19 1:50 AM, dean.l...@oracle.com wrote:
Could you move this code:
// Mark dependent AOT nmethods, which are only found via the
class redefined.
AOTLoader::mark_evol_dependent_methods(ik);
into this function:
C
On 2/4/19, 8:04 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Gary,
On 5/02/2019 12:01 am, Gary Adams wrote:
Two of the redefine classes tests (021, 023) have been on the
ProblemList since they
were first brought into the open repos. Both tests made an incorrect
assumption
about the access modifiers in class fil
On 5/02/2019 9:17 pm, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
Hmm. Lin's posting webrevs via xiaofeya (Felix Wang), so technically Felix is
publishing the code and so it's ok?
Lin is being listed as Contributor so there needs to be an OCA signed.
And what is Felix's status? I don't see him listed and don't kno
Hmm. Lin's posting webrevs via xiaofeya (Felix Wang), so technically Felix is
publishing the code and so it's ok?
Paul
On 2/5/19, 1:29 AM, "David Holmes" wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 5/02/2019 6:38 pm, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> Lin works for JDPower, which afaik has signed the OCA.
Hi Paul,
On 5/02/2019 6:38 pm, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
Lin works for JDPower, which afaik has signed the OCA.
I don't see them listed at:
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
Thanks,
David
On 2/4/19, 12:42 AM, "David Holmes" wrote:
Hi Lin,
Sorry but
Lin works for JDPower, which afaik has signed the OCA.
On 2/4/19, 12:42 AM, "David Holmes" wrote:
Hi Lin,
Sorry but can I just confirm that you have signed the OCA [1]? I don't
see you listed individually and I can't tell what company you work for
or whether your are cont
+1
Thanks,
Serguei
On 2/4/19 21:18, Jini George wrote:
Looks ok to me. Thanks!
-Jini.
On 2/5/2019 10:25 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Jini,
Thank you for your comment!
I uploaded new webrev. Could you review again?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8217845/webrev.01/
Diff from
18 matches
Mail list logo
