Fwd: Re: Verify error in hg:jdk/jdk -- repository now READ-ONLY

2019-07-24 Thread David Holmes
FYI open again --- Begin Message --- Hi. hg:jdk/jdk is now open and verifies. Even if your local repository is corrupt, you may continue using it. The corruption does not propagate via pushes, since changeset IDs are unchanged. I strongly advise everybody to at least understand whether their l

Fwd: Verify error in hg:jdk/jdk -- repository now READ-ONLY

2019-07-24 Thread David Holmes
FYI in case this was not seen on jdk-dev list. David --- Begin Message --- Hi. I've made the hg:jdk/jdk repository READ-ONLY. A verify error which was discovered in the repository and we'd like to ensure that no further changesets are pushed as a solution is investigated. Thanks, Ir

Re: RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any sun.boot.library.path paths are longer than JVM_MAXPATHLEN

2019-07-24 Thread Adam Farley8
Hi David, Welcome back. :) David Holmes wrote on 22/07/2019 03:34:37: > From: David Holmes > To: Adam Farley8 , hotspot- > d...@openjdk.java.net, serviceability-dev > Date: 22/07/2019 03:34 > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227021: VM fails if any sun.boot.library.path > paths are longer than JVM_MA

Re: RFR: 8170299: Debugger does not stop inside the low memory notifications code

2019-07-24 Thread Daniil Titov
Hi David, Hope you had a great vacation! Please find below the latest version of the change . The only difference from the version 01 is the corrected ordering of include statements as Serguei suggested. Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8170299/webrev.02/ Bug: https://bugs.openjdk

Re: RFR: 8185005: Improve performance of ThreadMXBean.getThreadInfo(long ids[], int maxDepth)

2019-07-24 Thread Daniil Titov
Hi David, Daniel, and Serguei, Please review the new version of the fix, that makes the thread table initialization on demand and moves it inside ThreadsList::find_JavaThread_from_java_tid(). At the creation time the thread table is initialized with the threads from the current thread list. We

Re: RFR(M): 8227680: FastJNIAccessors: Check for JVMTI field access event requests at runtime

2019-07-24 Thread Erik Osterlund
Hi Martin, Looks good for me. Thanks for cleaning up this code! /Erik > On 23 Jul 2019, at 19:50, Doerr, Martin wrote: > > Hi Erik, > > adding Andrew and Aleksey. > >> The new webrev looks good. > Thanks. > >> Note though the following though... it looks like the AArch64 code >> doesn't do