Thanks David, have a good time!
Richard.
-Original Message-
From: David Holmes
Sent: Dienstag, 18. August 2020 07:20
To: Reingruber, Richard ;
serguei.spit...@oracle.com; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8249293: Unsafe stackwalk in
VM_GetOrSetLocal::doit_prologu
Hi Richard,
The test seems a lot clearer to me now. I'll leave it to you are Serguei
to iron out any last wrinkles as I am disappearing on vacation for a
week after today. But you have my Review.
Thanks,
David
On 15/08/2020 12:06 am, Reingruber, Richard wrote:
Hi Serguei,
thanks for the fe
Hi Dmitry,
I agree with Alex, it is better to rename compareIPv6Addr to
isEqualIPv6Addr.
705 static int compareIPv6Addr(struct addrinfo *ai, struct in6_addr in6Addr)
706 {
707
708 if (ai->ai_addr->sa_family == AF_INET6) {
709 const struct sockad
On 08/07/2020 15:09, Alex Menkov wrote:
Hi all,
please review the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234808
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk16/jdb_options/webrev/
Some background:
when jdb launches debuggee process it passes java options from "options"
value for
Hi Dmitry,
In general the fix looks good to me.
Some notes:
please update copyright year;
I'd rename compareIPv6Addr to something like isEqualIPv6Addr or
equalsIPv6Addr;
Also both parameters should be const;
737 // Try to find bind address of preferred address familty first
"familty" ->
Aditya,
I think you've found the right alias...
A similar observation was made here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2020-March/030635.html
It looks like that conversation didn't go beyond Egor's original message
and Chris P's reply.
My recommendation would be to onl
Hi serviceability-dev,
I hope this is the right list for this topic, but feel free to redirect if
not...
It appears that there are jtreg tests that exercise JDI functionality without
protecting target
objects from being GC'd. An example of this is com/sun/jdi/VarargsTest.java,
where references
Hi Fairoz,
How you determine that +10Mb is enough with Graal?
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 8/17/20 5:46 AM, Fairoz Matte wrote:
Hi,
Please review this small test change to work with Graal.
Background:
Graal require more code cache compared to c1/c2. but the test case always set
it to 20MB
Ping…
Any comments?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
From: serviceability-dev on behalf
of "jiefu(傅杰)"
Date: Friday, August 7, 2020 at 7:44 AM
To: "serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net"
Subject: Re: RFR: 8251155: HostIdentifier fails to canonicalize hostnames
starting with digits(Internet mail)
FYI
Hi,
Please review this small test change to work with Graal.
Background:
Graal require more code cache compared to c1/c2. but the test case always set
it to 20MB. This may not be sufficient when running graal.
Default configuration for ReservedCodeCacheSize = 250MB
With graal enabled,
Dear all,
we found the jmap’s histo/dump command could accept "live" and "all"
options together, and the specification does not describe what is the expected
behavior of it.
I have tried that when these two options used together, the "live"
takes effect, no matter what sequ
Hello Everybody,
Please review the fix:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8250630/webrev.01/
Binding to IN6ADDR_ANY allow us to serve both IPv4 and IPv6 connections,
but binding to mapped INADDR_ANY (:::0.0.0.0) allow us to serve IPv4
connections only.
So make sure, that IN6AD
12 matches
Mail list logo
