Integrated: 8257928: Test image build failure with clang-10 due to -Wmisleading-indentation

2020-12-22 Thread Hao Sun
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:11:53 GMT, Hao Sun wrote: > Flag '-Wmisleading-indentation' was introduced since clang-10 [1] and > gcc-6 [2]. Putting the code with proper indentations would suppress this > warning. > > The main reason why test image build with gcc succeeds is that, clang > and gcc might

Re: RFR: 8165276: Spec states to invoke the premain method in an agent class if it's public but implementation differs [v11]

2020-12-22 Thread Serguei Spitsyn
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:07:12 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 1. Prperly reverted fixes in 3 tests; 2. Got rid of term in >> tests summary comment > > Thanks for the change. Lo

Re: RFR: 8165276: Spec states to invoke the premain method in an agent class if it's public but implementation differs [v11]

2020-12-22 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 22:11:19 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote: >> This change have been already reviewed by Mandy, Sundar, Alan and David. >> Please, see the jdk 15 review thread: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2020-June/031998.html >> >> Now, the PR approval is nee

Re: RFR: 8165276: Spec states to invoke the premain method in an agent class if it's public but implementation differs [v9]

2020-12-22 Thread Serguei Spitsyn
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 20:04:39 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 1. Suppress premain method check only if agent class is in unnamed module; >> 2. minor tests cleanup > > The change

Re: RFR: 8165276: Spec states to invoke the premain method in an agent class if it's public but implementation differs [v11]

2020-12-22 Thread Serguei Spitsyn
> This change have been already reviewed by Mandy, Sundar, Alan and David. > Please, see the jdk 15 review thread: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2020-June/031998.html > > Now, the PR approval is needed. > The push was postponed because the CSR was not approved at

Re: RFR: 8257928: Test image build failure with clang-10 due to -Wmisleading-indentation

2020-12-22 Thread Chris Plummer
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:11:53 GMT, Hao Sun wrote: > Flag '-Wmisleading-indentation' was introduced since clang-10 [1] and > gcc-6 [2]. Putting the code with proper indentations would suppress this > warning. > > The main reason why test image build with gcc succeeds is that, clang > and gcc might

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258832: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 18:00:29 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote: >> This is a trivial fix to ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java >> on Linux-X64. > > Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer). Thanks for the fast reviews! - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/59

[jdk16] Integrated: 8258832: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:42:49 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > This is a trivial fix to ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on > Linux-X64. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 61e5e393 Author:Daniel D. Daugherty URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk1

Re: RFR: 8257928: Test image build failure with clang-10 due to -Wmisleading-indentation

2020-12-22 Thread Alex Menkov
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:11:53 GMT, Hao Sun wrote: > Flag '-Wmisleading-indentation' was introduced since clang-10 [1] and > gcc-6 [2]. Putting the code with proper indentations would suppress this > warning. > > The main reason why test image build with gcc succeeds is that, clang > and gcc might

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258832: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64

2020-12-22 Thread Alex Menkov
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:42:49 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > This is a trivial fix to ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on > Linux-X64. Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/59

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258832: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64

2020-12-22 Thread Calvin Cheung
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:42:49 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > This is a trivial fix to ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on > Linux-X64. Looks good and trivial. - Marked as reviewed by ccheung (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/59

[jdk16] RFR: 8258832: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
This is a trivial fix to ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64. - Commit messages: - 8258832: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/AfterThreadDeathTest.java on Linux-X64 Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/59/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/

Re: RFR: 8165276: Spec states to invoke the premain method in an agent class if it's public but implementation differs [v10]

2020-12-22 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 05:47:19 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote: >> This change have been already reviewed by Mandy, Sundar, Alan and David. >> Please, see the jdk 15 review thread: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2020-June/031998.html >> >> Now, the PR approval is nee

[jdk16] Integrated: 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:56:33 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > ProblemList two java/rmi/Naming tests on Windows in order to reduce the > noise in the JDK16 CI. This is a trivial fix. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: eabc9030 Author:Daniel D. Daugherty URL: https

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows

2020-12-22 Thread Roger Riggs
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:56:33 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > ProblemList two java/rmi/Naming tests on Windows in order to reduce the > noise in the JDK16 CI. This is a trivial fix. Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/58

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows

2020-12-22 Thread Phil Race
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:56:33 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > ProblemList two java/rmi/Naming tests on Windows in order to reduce the > noise in the JDK16 CI. This is a trivial fix. overdue - Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/58

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:14:24 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> ProblemList two java/rmi/Naming tests on Windows in order to reduce the >> noise in the JDK16 CI. This is a trivial fix. > > overdue Thanks for the fast reviews! - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/58

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows

2020-12-22 Thread Mark Sheppard
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:56:33 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > ProblemList two java/rmi/Naming tests on Windows in order to reduce the > noise in the JDK16 CI. This is a trivial fix. LGTM - Marked as reviewed by msheppar (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/58

[jdk16] RFR: 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
ProblemList two java/rmi/Naming tests on Windows in order to reduce the noise in the JDK16 CI. This is a trivial fix. - Commit messages: - 8258827: ProblemList Naming/DefaultRegistryPort.java and Naming/legalRegistryNames/LegalRegistryNames.java on Windows Changes: https://git.open

[jdk16] Integrated: 8258802: ProblemList TestJstatdDefaults.java, TestJstatdRmiPort.java, and TestJstatdServer.java

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:09:33 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > ProblemList three jstatd tests on Win* to reduce the noise in the JDK16 CI. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 88dd6a94 Author:Daniel D. Daugherty URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/commit/88dd6a9

Re: [jdk16] RFR: 8258802: ProblemList TestJstatdDefaults.java, TestJstatdRmiPort.java, and TestJstatdServer.java

2020-12-22 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:44:51 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote: >> ProblemList three jstatd tests on Win* to reduce the noise in the JDK16 CI. > > Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer). @alexmenkov and @plummercj - Thanks for the fast reviews. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/