On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:24:38 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related
>> to Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>>
>> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
>> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:00:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> This RFE proposes to extend the MXBean framework to define a mapping to
>> records.
>>
>> The MXBean framework already defines a mapping of `CompositeType` to plain
>> java objects. Records are a natural representation of CompositeTypes.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:59:59 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> There's a comment above
> void VM_RedefineClasses::mark_dependent_code(InstanceKlass* ik) {
> that should be rewritten, so I think we should just file an RFE to remove it
> afterwards.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264941
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:28:27 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Vladimir Kozlov has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove exports from Graal module to jdk.aot
>
> Test changes look good to me.
There's a comment above
void
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:24:38 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related
>> to Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>>
>> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
>> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:00:30 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> GC changes look good.
>
>> void CodeCache::mark_for_evol_deoptimization(InstanceKlass* dependee) {
>> This function, its caller and the function in jvmtiRedefineClasses.cpp that
>> calls it can be deleted also, but you can file a
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:24:38 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related
>> to Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>>
>> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
>> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:58:11 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> Vladimir Kozlov has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove exports from Graal module to jdk.aot
>
> GC changes look good.
> void
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:24:38 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related
>> to Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>>
>> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
>> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:24:38 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related
>> to Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>>
>> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
>> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:23:52 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related to
> Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>
> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for execution
>
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:00:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> This RFE proposes to extend the MXBean framework to define a mapping to
>> records.
>>
>> The MXBean framework already defines a mapping of `CompositeType` to plain
>> java objects. Records are a natural representation of CompositeTypes.
> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related to
> Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>
> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for execution
> - related HotSpot code guarded by `#if INCLUDE_AOT`
>
>
> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related to
> Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>
> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for execution
> - related HotSpot code guarded by `#if INCLUDE_AOT`
>
>
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:17:48 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> A suspend request is done by handshaking thread target thread(s). When
>> executing the handshake operation we know the target mutator thread is in a
>> dormant state (as in safepoint safe state). We have a guarantee that it will
>> check
> As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related to
> Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
>
> - `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
> - `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for execution
> - related HotSpot code guarded by `#if INCLUDE_AOT`
>
>
As part of [JEP 410](http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/410) remove code related to
Ahead-of-Time Compiler from JDK:
- `jdk.aot` module — the `jaotc` tool
- `src/hotspot/share/aot` — loads AoT compiled code into VM for execution
- related HotSpot code guarded by `#if INCLUDE_AOT`
Additionally,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 17:57:13 GMT, Harold Seigel wrote:
> Please review this additional cleanup of use of TRAPS in hotspot runtime
> code. The changes were tested with Mach5 tiers 1-2 on Linux, Mac OS, and
> Windows and Mach5 tiers 3-5 on Linux x64.
>
> Thanks, Harold
This pull request has
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:10:00 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Harold Seigel has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> remove unneeded statement
>
> Hi Harold,
>
> Updates seem fine.
>
> Thanks,
> David
Thanks Lois, Patricio, David,
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:19:50 GMT, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Please review this additional cleanup of use of TRAPS in hotspot runtime
>> code. The changes were tested with Mach5 tiers 1-2 on Linux, Mac OS, and
>> Windows and Mach5 tiers 3-5 on Linux x64.
>>
>> Thanks, Harold
>
> Harold Seigel
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:43:58 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - minor style issue
>> - minor style issue
>
> Thanks for making the change. The spec change looks good to me.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 01:25:25 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Dan,
>> I'm sorry, I do not see much value in this approach going forward. One line
>> with a call to check_jvmti_status() does not add much to the platform
>> dependency no to complexity in native code. Also, more sophisticated
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:02:35 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Working on pushing a new version, it will not have addressed all comments
>> but many of them.
>> I will build and do testing before push, and start deep testing in the
>> background.
>>
>> I also merge with mainline.
>
> Hi Robbin,
>
> A suspend request is done by handshaking thread target thread(s). When
> executing the handshake operation we know the target mutator thread is in a
> dormant state (as in safepoint safe state). We have a guarantee that it will
> check it's poll before leaving the dormant state. To stop the
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:25:28 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>>> Hi Robbin,
>>> I'm looking at it. I have a concern that it can significantly impact Loom
>>> implementation. There is a non-trivial update in Loom to support virtual
>>> threads in JVMTI Suspend/Resume. So we need to make sure your
25 matches
Mail list logo
