Re: [jdk17] RFR: 8067223: [TESTBUG] Rename Whitebox API package

2021-07-28 Thread David Holmes
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 01:30:37 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves >> `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package? >> >> the majority of the patch is the following substitutions:

Re: [jdk17] RFR: 8067223: [TESTBUG] Rename Whitebox API package

2021-07-28 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:13:49 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote: > Hi all, > > could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves > `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package? > > the majority of the patch is the following substitutions: > -

[jdk17] RFR: 8067223: [TESTBUG] Rename Whitebox API package

2021-07-28 Thread Igor Ignatyev
Hi all, could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package? the majority of the patch is the following substitutions: - `s~sun/hotspot/WhiteBox~jdk/test/whitebox/WhiteBox~g` -

Integrated: 8269851: OperatingSystemMXBean getProcessCpuLoad reports incorrect process cpu usage in containers

2021-07-28 Thread xpbob
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 04:03:27 GMT, xpbob wrote: > …ocess cpu usage in containers This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 25f00d78 Author:bobpengxie Committer: Jie Fu URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/25f00d787cf56f6cdca6949115d04e7d8e675554 Stats: 218

Re: RFR: 8269934: RunThese24H.java failed with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in java_lang_Thread::get_thread_status

2021-07-28 Thread David Holmes
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:22:07 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote: >> If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object >> it can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads) >> of all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to >>

Re: [External] : Re: Information about possible JDB enhancements

2021-07-28 Thread Chris Plummer
On 7/27/21 6:14 PM, Jakob Cornell wrote: Thanks for the help Chris.  With the JBS ticket set up are we ready for a PR to be opened, or should I wait for the CSR review? Jakob It looks like some more discussion is needed before creating the CSR. You can still create a PR if you want to show

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Prasanta Sadhukhan
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed Thanks for awt/swing

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed Marked as reviewed by iris

Re: RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType [v2]

2021-07-28 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:38:04 GMT, Yi Yang wrote: >> For hotspot changes, it would be better to have a second review & wait for >> 24 hours before integration. >> Thanks. > >> For hotspot changes, it would be better to have a second review & wait for >> 24 hours before integration. >> Thanks.

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors [v2]

2021-07-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
> This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed Emmanuel Bourg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed . . Thank you! The PR

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:20:37 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> @FrauBoes thank you, the PR has been updated to modify the copyright year > > @ebourg for future PRs please do not force push after the PR is out for > review. Just push incremental commits normally. The Skara tooling will squash >

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors [v2]

2021-07-28 Thread Iris Clark
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:12:04 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> This PR fixes the following spelling errors: >> >> choosen -> chosen >> commad -> command >> hiearchy -> hierarchy >> leagacy -> legacy >> minium -> minimum >> subsytem -> subsystem >> unamed -> unnamed > > Emmanuel

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:08:01 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> I'm happy to sponsor this change, but could you please update the copyright >> year where necessary, e.g. in >> src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/X11/XMSelection.java: >> `Copyright (c) 2003, 2018, Oracle...` -> `Copyright (c)

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:26:49 GMT, Julia Boes wrote: >> This PR fixes the following spelling errors: >> >> choosen -> chosen >> commad -> command >> hiearchy -> hierarchy >> leagacy -> legacy >> minium -> minimum >> subsytem -> subsystem >> unamed -> unnamed > > I'm happy to

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Julia Boes
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed I'm happy to sponsor this

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Chris Plummer
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed jdi, jvmti, and dcmd

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Yi Yang
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed Hi, I've filed

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Chris Hegarty
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed Trivially, looks ok to me.

Re: RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Thomas Schatzl
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:12:25 GMT, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This PR fixes the following spelling errors: > > choosen -> chosen > commad -> command > hiearchy -> hierarchy > leagacy -> legacy > minium -> minimum > subsytem -> subsystem > unamed -> unnamed Lgtm. -

RFR: 8271396: Spelling errors

2021-07-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
This PR fixes the following spelling errors: choosen -> chosen commad -> command hiearchy -> hierarchy leagacy -> legacy minium -> minimum subsytem -> subsystem unamed -> unnamed - Commit messages: - 8271396: Fix spelling errors Changes:

Re: RFR: 8269934: RunThese24H.java failed with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in java_lang_Thread::get_thread_status

2021-07-28 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:03:10 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object it > can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads) of > all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to >

Re: RFR: 8269934: RunThese24H.java failed with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in java_lang_Thread::get_thread_status

2021-07-28 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:03:10 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object it > can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads) of > all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to >

RFR: 8269934: RunThese24H.java failed with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in java_lang_Thread::get_thread_status

2021-07-28 Thread David Holmes
If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object it can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads) of all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to get_thread_status(). ** JMM dumpThreads API The initial fix simply

Re: RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType [v2]

2021-07-28 Thread Yi Yang
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:24:41 GMT, Jie Fu wrote: > For hotspot changes, it would be better to have a second review & wait for 24 > hours before integration. > Thanks. Well, it seems a trivial change, maybe one review is okay. For non-trivial changes, we really need more reviews and wait for

Re: RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType [v2]

2021-07-28 Thread Jie Fu
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:06:56 GMT, Yi Yang wrote: >> Should be PHASE_CCP instead of PHASE_CPP, it also affects dumped ideal graph >> XML. > > Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit > since the last revision: > > update copyright year For hotspot

Re: RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType

2021-07-28 Thread Yi Yang
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:19:08 GMT, Yi Yang wrote: > Should be PHASE_CCP instead of PHASE_CPP, it also affects dumped ideal graph > XML. Thank you Jie for review! - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4917

Integrated: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType

2021-07-28 Thread Yi Yang
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:19:08 GMT, Yi Yang wrote: > Should be PHASE_CCP instead of PHASE_CPP, it also affects dumped ideal graph > XML. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 072fe486 Author:Yi Yang URL:

Re: RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType [v2]

2021-07-28 Thread Yi Yang
> Should be PHASE_CCP instead of PHASE_CPP, it also affects dumped ideal graph > XML. Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: update copyright year - Changes: - all:

Re: RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType

2021-07-28 Thread Jie Fu
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:19:08 GMT, Yi Yang wrote: > Should be PHASE_CCP instead of PHASE_CPP, it also affects dumped ideal graph > XML. Looks good to me. The copyright year should also be updated. Thanks. - Marked as reviewed by jiefu (Reviewer). PR:

RFR: 8270901: Typo PHASE_CPP in CompilerPhaseType

2021-07-28 Thread Yi Yang
Should be PHASE_CCP instead of PHASE_CPP, it also affects dumped ideal graph XML. - Commit messages: - typo Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4917/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=4917=00 Issue: