On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 06:11:37 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/services/threadService.cpp line 879:
>>
>>> 877: // If thread is still attaching then threadObj will be NULL.
>>> 878: _thread_status = threadObj == NULL ? JavaThreadStatus::NEW
>>> 879:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 06:12:35 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object
>> it can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads)
>> of all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to
>> g
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:17:19 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
>> If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object
>> it can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads)
>> of all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:03:10 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object it
> can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads) of
> all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to
> get_thr
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:38:44 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The fix updates the tests to use dynamic port launching debuggee and get the
> listening port from the debugee output
Hi Alex,
The fix looks good to me. While you are a this code, may I ask you to do a
minor cleanup and get rid of several
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:38:44 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The fix updates the tests to use dynamic port launching debuggee and get the
> listening port from the debugee output
test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/share/IORedirector.java line 74:
> 72: this();
> 73: this.bin = in;
>
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 23:30:55 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c8add223
Author:Jesper Wilhelmsson
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/c8add223a10030e40ccef42e081fd0d8f00e0593
Stats: 534 li
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 23:53:59 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
>> Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
>
> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Revert "8271150: Remove EA from JDK 17 version string starting with Initial
> Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Revert "8271150: Remove EA from JDK 17 version string starting with Initial
RC promotion on Aug 5, 2021(B34)"
This reverts commit f8fb5713074b8
Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
-
Commit messages:
- Merge
- 8067223: [TESTBUG] Rename Whitebox API package
- 8271150: Remove EA from JDK 17 version string starting with Initial RC
promotion on Aug 5, 2021(B34)
The webrevs contain the adjustments done while merging with regards to e
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:03:10 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> If a thread is attaching via JNI and has not yet created its Thread object it
> can be caught in a ThreadSnapshot during a thread dump (VM_DumpThreads) of
> all threads**, and the threadObj() will be NULL, so we can't pass it to
> get_thr
On 3/08/2021 2:25 am, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:42:10 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Hi all,
could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves
`sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package?
the majority of the patch is the
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:13:49 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves
> `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package?
>
> the majority of the patch is the following substitutions:
> - `s~s
> A trivial fix to support JFR use of new ThreadsList::Iterator.
>
> This fix was tested with Mach5 Tier[1-3].
Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:56:39 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I agree with these revised changes for JDK 17.
Thanks for your review, Vladimir.
I'll rerun my testing before integrating (just for good luck).
-- Igor
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/290
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:42:10 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves
>> `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package?
>>
>> the majority of the patch is the following substitutions:
>>
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves
> `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package?
>
> the majority of the patch is the following substitutions:
> - `s~sun/hotspot/WhiteBox~jdk/test/whitebox/WhiteBox~g`
> - `s
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:42:10 GMT, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves
>> `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package?
>>
>> the majority of the patch is the following substitutions:
>>
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 12:04:17 GMT, Lin Zang wrote:
>> This PR rewrite the implementation of the HeapHprofBinWriter, which could
>> simplify the logic of current implementation.
>> please see detail description at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8269685.
>
> Lin Zang has updated the pu
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:22:31 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Lin Zang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits
>>
20 matches
Mail list logo
