On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 05:17:26 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> The issue appears to be due to running jstack before allowing the 4 threads
> created by `LingeredAppWithLock` to fully start up and reach their blocking
> or timed wait state. With this fix `LingeredAppWithLock.main()` now waits
> until
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 05:17:26 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> The issue appears to be due to running jstack before allowing the 4 threads
> created by `LingeredAppWithLock` to fully start up and reach their blocking
> or timed wait state. With this fix `LingeredAppWithLock.main()` now waits
> until
The issue appears to be due to running jstack before allowing the 4 threads
created by `LingeredAppWithLock` to fully start up and reach their blocking or
timed wait state. With this fix `LingeredAppWithLock.main()` now waits until
the threads have reached the blocking or timed wait state before
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:36:43 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Increase the test timeout to 480 just to make sure we don't see this timeout
> anymore. This same change was already made to TestJmapCoreMetaspace.java a
> long time ago.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 19ce33d5
Aut
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:36:43 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Increase the test timeout to 480 just to make sure we don't see this timeout
> anymore. This same change was already made to TestJmapCoreMetaspace.java a
> long time ago.
Thanks for the reviews!
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.jav
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 04:09:51 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote:
> JDK-8276681: Additional malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b8ac0d20
Author:Tim Prinzing
Committer: Lance Andersen
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/b8ac
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 04:09:51 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote:
> JDK-8276681: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source
> jdk/internal/net/http/ResponseSubscribers.java
Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6486
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:36:43 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Increase the test timeout to 480 just to make sure we don't see this timeout
> anymore. This same change was already made to TestJmapCoreMetaspace.java a
> long time ago.
Thumbs up. This is a trivial change.
-
Marked as revi
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:36:43 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Increase the test timeout to 480 just to make sure we don't see this timeout
> anymore. This same change was already made to TestJmapCoreMetaspace.java a
> long time ago.
Marked as reviewed by lmesnik (Reviewer).
-
PR: https
Increase the test timeout to 480 just to make sure we don't see this timeout
anymore. This same change was already made to TestJmapCoreMetaspace.java a long
time ago.
-
Commit messages:
- Increase test timeout from 240 to 480
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6676/fil
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:26:04 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional
>> co
11 matches
Mail list logo