On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:08:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Clarify the help output for VM.class_hierarchy. The old jcmd help output was
> misleading, and because of this got translated incorrectly for the man page.
Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:08:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Clarify the help output for VM.class_hierarchy. The old jcmd help output was
> misleading, and because of this got translated incorrectly for the man page.
LGTM 2.
Thanks,
David
-
Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:08:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Clarify the help output for VM.class_hierarchy. The old jcmd help output was
> misleading, and because of this got translated incorrectly for the man page.
Looks good and trivial.
Thanks, Thomas
-
Marked as reviewed by stue
Clarify the help output for VM.class_hierarchy. The old jcmd help output was
misleading, and because of this got translated incorrectly for the man page.
-
Commit messages:
- Fix VM.class_hierarchy help output and man page.
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6845/files
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 03:10:00 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> ArrayTypeImp::newInstance() was returning false instead of true for one error
> condition, resulting in a failure to send a reply packet containing the
> error. See the bug description for details.
This pull request has now been integrat
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:00:02 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> This changes removes (most) Attach API tests from exclusiveAccess.dirs so the
> tests can be run in parallel. I haven't seen any issues with this change,
> except the jstatd tests can fail due to an RMI issue. I filed
> https://bugs.open
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:14:45 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Include the size of the core file when printing a message that it was found.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 54c9a996
Author:Chris Plummer
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/54c9a99663c47b047739
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:42:00 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> This change makes VM_Version_Ext part of VM_Version (the platform dependent
>> part) and moves some duplicated code. x86 had the most code in
>> VM_Version_Ext, so the most code moved there. There might be some unneeded
>> function
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:42:00 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> This change makes VM_Version_Ext part of VM_Version (the platform dependent
>> part) and moves some duplicated code. x86 had the most code in
>> VM_Version_Ext, so the most code moved there. There might be some unneeded
>> function
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:57:36 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> SA had a bunch of vtable related code that searched for the vtable pointer of
> a hotspot object in a few places. This was all related to weird ways that
> Solaris would store the vtable pointer. In the case of
> https://bugs.openjdk.jav
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:42:00 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> This change makes VM_Version_Ext part of VM_Version (the platform dependent
>> part) and moves some duplicated code. x86 had the most code in
>> VM_Version_Ext, so the most code moved there. There might be some unneeded
>> function
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 03:10:00 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> ArrayTypeImp::newInstance() was returning false instead of true for one error
> condition, resulting in a failure to send a reply packet containing the
> error. See the bug description for details.
Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:24:10 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> src/hotspot/os/linux/os_perf_linux.cpp line 929:
>>
>>> 927: bool CPUInformationInterface::initialize() {
>>> 928: _cpu_info = new CPUInformation();
>>> 929: VM_Version::initialize_cpu_information();
>>
>> I can't figure out when
> This change makes VM_Version_Ext part of VM_Version (the platform dependent
> part) and moves some duplicated code. x86 had the most code in
> VM_Version_Ext, so the most code moved there. There might be some unneeded
> functions but I didn't want to remove them with this change.
>
> Tier1 (
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 23:14:43 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change makes VM_Version_Ext part of VM_Version (the platform dependent
> part) and moves some duplicated code. x86 had the most code in
> VM_Version_Ext, so the most code moved there. There might be some unneeded
> functions bu
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 02:32:54 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> This change makes VM_Version_Ext part of VM_Version (the platform dependent
>> part) and moves some duplicated code. x86 had the most code in
>> VM_Version_Ext, so the most code moved there. There might be some unneeded
>> functions but
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:57:36 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> SA had a bunch of vtable related code that searched for the vtable pointer of
> a hotspot object in a few places. This was all related to weird ways that
> Solaris would store the vtable pointer. In the case of
> https://bugs.openjdk.jav
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 03:10:00 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> ArrayTypeImp::newInstance() was returning false instead of true for one error
> condition, resulting in a failure to send a reply packet containing the
> error. See the bug description for details.
Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewe
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:14:45 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Include the size of the core file when printing a message that it was found.
Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6822
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:00:02 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> This changes removes (most) Attach API tests from exclusiveAccess.dirs so the
> tests can be run in parallel. I haven't seen any issues with this change,
> except the jstatd tests can fail due to an RMI issue. I filed
> https://bugs.open
20 matches
Mail list logo
