David, thanks for finding that!
joe
On 05/22/2013 08:09 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Joe,
On 23/05/2013 5:27 AM, Joseph Provino wrote:
Is there a consensus what is in the webrev is okay?
Yes I am now okay with it. I found this in 4889433:
"AsyncGetCallTrace() requires the CLASS_LOAD eve
https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8013461
There is a symbol AsyncGetCallTrace in libjvm.symbols that does not
exist in
minimal/libjvm.a when DEBUG_LEVEL == release
joe
On 05/21/2013 04:52 PM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
On 5/21/2013 4:00 PM, Oleg Mazurov wrote:
Though formally not part of
r the quick reply.
joe
-- Oleg
On 5/21/2013 12:19 PM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
On 5/21/2013 3:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 5/21/13 11:26 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
On 5/21/2013 2:23 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 21 maj 2013, at 17:35, JOSEPH PROVINO
wrote:
On 5/21/2013 3:
On 5/21/2013 3:16 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 5/21/13 11:26 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
On 5/21/2013 2:23 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 21 maj 2013, at 17:35, JOSEPH PROVINO
wrote:
On 5/21/2013 3:06 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Staffan,
On 21/05/2013 4:49 PM, Staffan Larsen
On 5/21/2013 2:23 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 21 maj 2013, at 17:35, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
On 5/21/2013 3:06 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Staffan,
On 21/05/2013 4:49 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 21 maj 2013, at 04:34, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Joe,
As I have previously stated you copied
David
On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
conditionalize the code so that
only AsyncGetCallTrace() is defined with the minimal jvm.
Webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jprovino/8013461/webrev.00/
* JDK-8013461 <
o either of you feel strongly about how this should be fixed --
return an error or remove the symbol?
joe
Thanks,
David
/Staffan
Thanks,
David
On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
conditionalize the code so that
only As
ticks_no_class_load is deemed appropriate in this situation. Who
will be consuming this value?
Thanks,
David
On 21/05/2013 5:10 AM, JOSEPH PROVINO wrote:
The change is to include forte.cpp in the minimal jvm but to
conditionalize the code so that
only AsyncGetCallTrace() is defined with the minimal
