On 03/10/2016 07:59 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi all,
This review request continues from:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/2016-March/016774.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/2016-March/016896.html
I wonder that STW phases (Remark and Clea
tml
On 2016/03/17 8:23, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Jon,
2016/03/17 3:25 "Jon Masamitsu" <mailto:jon.masami...@oracle.com>>:
>
>
>
> On 03/10/2016 07:59 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This review request continues
Yasumasa,
We're discussing this.
What would the result be if the GC team made the
JVM changes that you want to contribute. Meaning,
without the jdk changes, will jstat continue to work
as it currently does? Would the changes in the JVM
be useful to you without the jstat changes? By the
JVM ch
Ramki,
Changes look good.
I'm guessing you tested by generating the
perfdata by hand and verifying the contents
of the perfdata. Do you think a test can
be written to verify the change? If you look at
test/gc/metaspace/TestMetaspacePerfCounters.java
in your repository I think that is an exa
I still need a review from an official "reviewer" please.
Jon
On 1/4/2013 2:41 PM, Jon Masamitsu wrote:
8004172: Remove display of permanent generation counters from jstat
options
This change removes from the jstat options the display of
permanent generation counters. It al
8004172: Remove display of permanent generation counters from jstat options
This change removes from the jstat options the display of
permanent generation counters. It also removes entirely the
gcpermcapacity option.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmasa/8004172/webrev.00/
The permanent generatio
