Re: bug in JVMTI

2016-04-18 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
g filed: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147451 > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov > > On 4/18/16 9:17 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote: >> What bug is this on bugs.openjdk.java.net <http://bugs.openjdk.jva.net>? >> >>> On 18 apr. 2016, at 20:09, k...@kode

bug in JVMTI

2016-04-18 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
Hi all, For almost a year (j)VisualVM (jFluid) has been running into this JVMTI bug. # Problematic frame: # V [libjvm.dylib+0x44691c] Method::checked_resolve_jmethod_id(_jmethodID*)+0x22 …. Current thread (0x7ffdcc08b000): JavaThread "*** Profiler Agent Communication Thread" daemon [_th

Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8151442: jstack doesn't close quotation marks properly with threads' name greater than 1996 characters

2016-03-21 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 21.03.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Robbin Ehn: >> (I must admit I'm very curious why anyone would have a thread name that >> long) I am also curious but that said, if the API allows for it, the tooling should do the right thing with the data.

Re: G1 STW phases and FGC column in jstat

2016-03-02 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
gt; > I guess that I will want to check them at G1. > > Thus, at least, I want to add PerfCounter for CGC (and add JVMTI event hook). > However, this proposal will affect to jstat spec. > So I want to discuss about it before filing to JBS. > > > Thanks, > > Yasumasa

Re: G1 STW phases and FGC column in jstat

2016-03-02 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
log? > Should we add new PerfCounter for CGC (and add CGC column to jstat output)? > > > Yasumasa > > > On 2016/03/02 6:35, k...@kodewerk.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think it is incorrect to count remark and cleanup as FGC. They are not >> full collections.

Re: G1 STW phases and FGC column in jstat

2016-03-01 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
Hi, I think it is incorrect to count remark and cleanup as FGC. They are not full collections. It is also incorrect to count initial mark and remark in CMS as a FGC. It is unfortunate that this is counted this way. Regards, Kirk > On Mar 1, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: > > Hi al

Re: RFR: 8146009: "pure virtual method called" with using new GC logging mechanism

2016-01-20 Thread k...@kodewerk.com
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 AM, David Holmes wrote: > > On 19/01/2016 11:58 PM, Marcus Larsson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review the following patch to fix an issue in UL causing the VM >> to crash during shutdown. >> >> The problem is that the static LogStdoutOutput is deinitialized before >>