On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:00:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> This RFE proposes to extend the MXBean framework to define a mapping to
>> records.
>>
>> The MXBean framework already defines a mapping of `CompositeType` to plain
>> java objects. Records are a natural representation of CompositeTypes.
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:00:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> This RFE proposes to extend the MXBean framework to define a mapping to
>> records.
>>
>> The MXBean framework already defines a mapping of `CompositeType` to plain
>> java objects. Records are a natural representation of CompositeTypes.
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:00:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> This RFE proposes to extend the MXBean framework to define a mapping to
>> records.
>>
>> The MXBean framework already defines a mapping of `CompositeType` to plain
>> java objects. Records are a natural representation of CompositeTypes.
> This RFE proposes to extend the MXBean framework to define a mapping to
> records.
>
> The MXBean framework already defines a mapping of `CompositeType` to plain
> java objects. Records are a natural representation of CompositeTypes. A
> record can be easily reconstructed from a
