On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:58:29 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
>> (RFC:
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2021-October/039796.html)
>>
>> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
>> diagnostic commands last week.
>>
>> At present, I have imp
On 11/9/21 2:07 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 10/14/21 12:38 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 14/10/2021 5:14 pm, Denghui Dong wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:43:20 GMT, David Holmes
wrote:
I'm not sure exactly where this API would need to go. IIUC jcmd
doesn't
exist at the Java level it is just
On 10/14/21 12:38 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 14/10/2021 5:14 pm, Denghui Dong wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:43:20 GMT, David Holmes
wrote:
I'm not sure exactly where this API would need to go. IIUC jcmd doesn't
exist at the Java level it is just a tool, so introducing an API to
interact wit
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 07:17:37 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> Hi Denghui,
>
> as I wrote before, I am neutral on this. But I agree with @egahlin that this
> seems to be more on JEP level. A PR is not the right first step for this, and
> I am afraid you won't build much consensus here. Maybe discuss
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:58:29 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
>> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
>> diagnostic commands last week.
>>
>> At present, I have implemented a preliminary version.
>>
>> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in t
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:58:29 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
>> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
>> diagnostic commands last week.
>>
>> At present, I have implemented a preliminary version.
>>
>> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in t
> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
> diagnostic commands last week.
>
> At present, I have implemented a preliminary version.
>
> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Java layer
> (under sun.management.cmd) for defining and r
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 01:54:16 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > Hi,
> > Interesting proposal. I have some questions.
> >
> > * Will hanging java user code block the attach listener thread? If yes, how
> > would you solve that?
>
> In my current implementation, I use a simple timeout
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:42:09 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
> diagnostic commands last week.
>
> At present, I have implemented a preliminary version.
>
> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Jav
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:42:09 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
> diagnostic commands last week.
>
> At present, I have implemented a preliminary version.
>
> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Jav
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:42:09 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
> I proposed to extend DCmd to allow Java developers to customize their own
> diagnostic commands last week.
>
> At present, I have implemented a preliminary version.
>
> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Jav
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:40:20 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Ah right - so you're really looking at extending the capabilities of the
> DiagnosticCommandMBean to add a way to register a Java diagnostic command.
Yes, but we could not add registration API to DiagnosticCommandMBean directly.
There are
On 14/10/2021 5:14 pm, Denghui Dong wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:43:20 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
I'm not sure exactly where this API would need to go. IIUC jcmd doesn't
exist at the Java level it is just a tool, so introducing an API to
interact with it seems problematic to me.
IMO, `jcmd` i
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:43:20 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly where this API would need to go. IIUC jcmd doesn't
exist at the Java level it is just a tool, so introducing an API to
interact with it seems problematic to me.
IMO, `jcmd` is a client of `dcmd`, the user also can use
On 14/10/2021 4:32 pm, Denghui Dong wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:17:13 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Java layer
(under sun.management.cmd)
An API that is expected to be used by application code can't go in the
unsupported/intern
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:17:13 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Java
> > layer (under sun.management.cmd)
>
> An API that is expected to be used by application code can't go in the
> unsupported/internal-use-only sun.management namesp
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:42:09 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote:
> In the current implementation, I provided some simple APIs in the Java layer
> (under sun.management.cmd)
An API that is expected to be used by application code can't go in the
unsupported/internal-use-only sun.management namespace. This
17 matches
Mail list logo
