Thanks David.
-Harsha
On Tuesday 20 March 2018 02:13 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Harsha,
Given the negative nature of the test this approach seems quite
reasonable.
Thanks,
David
Harsha Wardhana B
Ping! Can I have one more review for the below fix?
Thanks
Hi Harsha,
Given the negative nature of the test this approach seems quite reasonable.
Thanks,
David
Harsha Wardhana B
Ping! Can I have one more review for the below fix?
Thanks
Harsha
On Monday 26 February 2018 10:42 AM, Harsha Wardhana B wrote:
Hello
Ping! Can I have one more review for the below fix?
Thanks
Harsha
On Monday 26 February 2018 10:42 AM, Harsha Wardhana B wrote:
Hello All,
Requesting for review from one more reviewer.
Thanks
Harsha
On Wednesday 21 February 2018 10:01 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Harsha,
Not a review, but
Hello All,
Requesting for review from one more reviewer.
Thanks
Harsha
On Wednesday 21 February 2018 10:01 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Harsha,
Not a review, but just a request that you add the explanation of the
problem to the CR so we have a record of it. Also, the copyright needs
to be
Hi Harsha,
Not a review, but just a request that you add the explanation of the
problem to the CR so we have a record of it. Also, the copyright needs
to be updated.
thanks,
Chris
On 2/20/18 3:30 AM, Harsha Wardhana B wrote:
Hi All,
Please find the fix below for the Jdp test-case.
Looks OK.
Erik
Hi All,
Please find the fix below for the Jdp test-case.
issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196028
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hb/8196028/webrev.00/
Fix details : The test was receiving JDP packets from other VM and
hence the multi-cast socket was not